Christian identity
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I've had a look at the links you put up. That just strikes me as almost identical to Armstrongism. Doesn't your version of events still claim that yids and Whites shared the same ancestors - all of them until Isaac - until a few millennia ago? For the Weisman book that you linked identifies Esau with Edomites and Jacob with proto-Europeans. (This book strangely seems to have been seized upon by Black Israelite idiots who insist that Weisman is obscuring the "truth" that Isaac, Jacob, and the other prophets and messengers of God before them were all Africans, a view noticeably more incredulous than the view that they were all Europeans.)
Yet it strikes me now as obviously incredulous, this conclusion that the yids came from a proto-European bloodline as would have been the case if Esau was in some sense, the first yid. Come to think of it, Armstrongism is similarly incredulous, since the conclusion is, again, that the yids came from a proto-European bloodline if Benjamin and Judah were in some sense the first yids.
There is only one difference that I perceive so far from what you promote - you do not make it clear whether you are Christian Identity, although Weisman is indeed identified as a Christian Identity author - and Armstrongism. Armstrongism generally if not always claims that the yids are descendants of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin while the other ten tribes of Israel were proto-European. You claim, by contrast, that all twelve tribes of Israel were proto-European, and you push the origin of the yid back one generation from Judah and Benjamin to Esau.
If you believe yourself to be representative of CI, is that the only difference in CI from Armstrongism regarding the origin of the yid? Namely, that the first yid was Jacob's brother, Esau, rather than Judah or Benjamin, which means that the yids very narrowly miss out on being Israelites?
So, no, jews are not of Jacob-Israel or Isaac. They are their own separate, distinct race of edomites and khazars/ashkenazis. All Whites, and only Whites, come from Adam -> Noah -> Abraham -> Isaac -> Jacob-Israel. Jews are not of Judah or any other tribe of Israel. A dog born in a stable is not a horse, a nigger born in Europe is not European, a White born in China is not Chinese, therefore a jew born in Judea is not a Judean.
If Christian Identity claims that the negroid came from Cain and apes, but the Apartheid-era religious authorities claimed that the negroid came from the 'curse of Ham', why should the CI interpretation be trusted, for instance, over the aforementioned Apartheid-era interpretation?
So because the Flood was local, not worldwide, Ham would not have created the niggers. They already existed before the Flood and were not included in it. Ham's descendants do indeed include Canaan though, as he was the first one to completely mix their White DNA out of existence. Cush became the Ethiopians, Mizraim became the Egptians, and Phut became Libya.