Consume Product - Arete Network

Moon landings were real

posted 1 month ago by Cstriker04 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / )

Permalink

I distrust those who call the moon landings fake. If they are, so what? World is full of more important shit to talk about. If you want to say there are no moon landings or germs seen under microscopes I will assume idf faggots paid you to say this. White girls are being raped by niggers and sandniggers. Hate women? White men are being enslaved by kikes using taxes. There are a million things you can talk about that are more important than calling the moon landing fake. Look at how bad the jews are at inventing evidence for the holohoax and covering up truth. You think they magically got better when it came to bacteria and viruses and the moon landings? Jews aren't smart enough for that. "Viruses don't exist you're just shedding toxins"niggers belong in woodchippers. You solely exist to make the movement look bad and you're hyperfixated on this because you think expressing this much skepticism towards the existence of objective truths like germs and the moon landing makes you superior to everyone who believes in them.

Edit: by the way I lured out all the JIDFniggers, YOUR'RE WELCOME. These enemy combatants who FAILED the IQ test... They just can't help themselves.

How come communists get useful idiots and we get useless retards? So unfair.

-3

ImBillCurtis on scored.co

1 month ago -3 points (+0 / -0 / ) 3 children

I’ll believe it when they do it, live steam it with multiple backups with front-facing dash cams, and have a private entrepreneur (no deepstate faggots) replicate the process.

Permalink Reply

HarlechMan on scored.co

1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

At this point over half a dozen other countries, including rivals like China, have photographed Apollo landing sites. The landers are there, you can see the rovers left behind on the later missions. Thousands of people saw the rockets go up with their bare eyes. You can go in person to see Saturn V's today, unused LEMs, and actual Apollo capsules that survived re-entry.

The strongest evidence against gassings at Auschwitz is that it was not technically feasible as described, and there is critical physical evidence lacking today. The strongest evidence for the Moon landing is that it WAS technically feasible, and there are mounds of physical evidence around today.

-4

1 month ago -4 points (+0 / -0 / )

That’s cool…. So where’s the dash cam footage?

albatrosv15 on scored.co

1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )

Yeah no, not anymore. AI will make everything on a screen true.

-1

bluewhiteandred on scored.co

1 month ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

not responding to the other comment that replied but same for me, they simply won't livestream it and nasa keeps delaying "going back": https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20241206-nasa-delays-us-return-mission-moon-artemis-until-2027

\> two more weeks!

deleted 1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 2 children

1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / )

> a phone call to Nixon with zero delay

and somehow today people still have all kinds of cell phone calls drop!!! Why don't they just use this "mature" phone call technology...?!

1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child

The radio delay time between Earth and the moon is about 1.25 seconds. So for a two-way delay you're looking at about 2.5-3 seconds. I'm linking an audio recording of the call. There are two instances of a two-way delay. One when Houston informs the astronauts of the call. The second after Nixon finishes his message and Neil Armstrong replies. The first delay is about 6-7 seconds, the second is about 8 seconds. More than enough time for the delay as well as a natural pause in conversation. The only thime when there is no delay in the conversation is when Houston control tells Nixon to go ahead, but that is a terrestrial communication from Texas to Washington D.C. Not the moon.

https://youtu.be/1Ai_HCBDQIQ

1 month ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / )

No.