New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I distrust those who call the moon landings fake. If they are, so what? World is full of more important shit to talk about. If you want to say there are no moon landings or germs seen under microscopes I will assume idf faggots paid you to say this. White girls are being raped by niggers and sandniggers. Hate women? White men are being enslaved by kikes using taxes. There are a million things you can talk about that are more important than calling the moon landing fake. Look at how bad the jews are at inventing evidence for the holohoax and covering up truth. You think they magically got better when it came to bacteria and viruses and the moon landings? Jews aren't smart enough for that. "Viruses don't exist you're just shedding toxins"niggers belong in woodchippers. You solely exist to make the movement look bad and you're hyperfixated on this because you think expressing this much skepticism towards the existence of objective truths like germs and the moon landing makes you superior to everyone who believes in them.

Edit: by the way I lured out all the JIDFniggers, YOUR'RE WELCOME. These enemy combatants who FAILED the IQ test... They just can't help themselves.

How come communists get useful idiots and we get useless retards? So unfair.
You must log in or sign up to comment
61 comments:
12
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 month ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 1 child
Claiming the moon landing was a hoax is right up there with flat earth and "dinosaurs aren't real" when it comes to well poisoning. In our circles they are used to mix in with real "conspiracies" to make the latter seem ridiculous, and also to send well meaning novices on wild goose chases.

Doubly so because the Apollo program was effectively the culmination of European science and spirit of exploration. Perhaps its pinnacle if we don't get back on track.
Fabius on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
It was the pinnacle. White civilization has been ground down by jews and their feral pets.

Only after 1000 years of darkness will we have cleansed the earth of them.
11
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 month ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror )
Blood isn't real either, it's an illusion caused by your vril ducts crying when you get hurt. Absolutely everything else works as though you did have blood, but you don't and if you say you do you must be a Jew.

That's what all of these sound like to me.

I'm not even particularily convinced that the moon landings were real, it just doesn't change *anything* if they weren't.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 month ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 2 children
It is quite possible that the Moon landing happened, and it is utterly irrelevant. It was important during the "arms race" with the Soviet Union, and as such it wouldn't be surprising if both sides lied as much as possible.

And it's not like there is any value in landing on the Moon. It's a barren moon. You can do NOTHING on it. If you want a challenge, there is more potential on the Antarctic than on the Moon - at least you can breathe.

As of the viruses-does-not-exist theory, it's retarded. Bring tangible conclusions like "do this" or "don't do this", then we can see the merit of those statements. But it is fact that there are flu seasons (today rebranded to "Covid"), times in which more people get infected and that those are not curable. And there are times when people get less infected. Temperature appears to play a role in the efficiency of our immune systems. Bacteria however *can* be cured via antibiotics, so we cannot just dismiss medicine as it is.

Does the viruses-does-not-exist theory help in fighting viruses? No? Then it's worthless.
-7
disoriented on scored.co
1 month ago -7 points (+0 / -0 / -7Score on mirror ) 1 child
>Does the viruses-does-not-exist theory help in fighting viruses? No? Then it's worthless.

You destroyed everything you said with that statement. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever and shows us that you fail at critical thinking. The rest of what you said was pretty imbecilic too.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
> and shows us

You and what other retards?

> You destroyed everything you said with that statement.

Is it because of semantics? One has to be extra careful with the likes of flat Earthers as to not offend their fragile egos.

> you fail at critical thinking

Then explain to me how I "failed at critical thinking." Because if I counted correctly, the amount of arguments is 0... which isn't particularly much.
-11
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago -11 points (+0 / -0 / -11Score on mirror ) 2 children
You still believe in viruses?
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 month ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 2 children
Every time someone says "Og mah Gurd, you still believe in...", I lose a little bit more patience with them, and anyone who agrees with them.

This isn't an argument, it's not in good faith, and it makes you sound like a woman.
BlippiIsAPedo on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
> sound like a woman.

💯 agree.
-1
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror )
So where’s the virus?
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Still? Nothing has contributed to change my mind. Even if we entertain the idea that viruses are an unknown, unobservable concept, and that there are temporary, incurable diseases (known as flu), not believing in "viruses" doesn't stop me from getting some kind of coof which leads to fever, which obviously is transmitted by people who are also sick.

That disease spreads regionally over time, meaning "infection" is a well established part of it. Therefore, it has to be *something* that is carried within people. You can say it's bad voodoo magic, but let's just call that thing "virus." We also know that during colder seasons more people are infected, while during the warmer seasons less are infected.

We also know about how a disease caused by viruses progresses in a person's body - the symptoms start small and get to a high point, and after a while (days, weeks) they subside until that person is cured and immunized to it. Or dead from it.

We also know about incubation time, which is just the time between infection and the showing of symptoms. That aids the virus to spread without being noticed. But naturally the virus would have to spread within a body enough to cause enough damage to a body to show symptoms.

We have GOOD theories pulling everything we know together.

So what exactly is the problem here? Clearly you can't just fuck around with the well established parts of it, as it would be an instance of "don't believe your lying eyes and brain", so what shall it be?
-4
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago -4 points (+0 / -0 / -4Score on mirror ) 1 child

Virus theory is jewish medical fraud designed to trick you into taking kike vaccines and “anti-virals” that trick your God-given detoxification systems into turning off.
There has never been virus isolation procedures
-1
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 month ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror ) 1 child
> Virus theory is jewish medical fraud designed to trick you into taking kike vaccines

That's an extremely novel development. Viruses have been known to exist for over a century (~1890). The vaccine garbage came relatively recently, and it got popularized/marketed via Covid™. So unless it's a multi-generational con, this is a bad assumption.

> and “anti-virals” that trick your God-given detoxification systems into turning off.

Only a minority who get sick take it, and there is no reason to assume it makes you more sick instead of curing/helping. I mean that would be utterly retarded. Fact is, there is no effective way to cure virus based diseases, it depends on the "God-given" body's immune system anyway.

And I have been sick several times, sometimes less severely, sometimes more - and I never took antivirals.

> There has never been virus isolation procedures

So?
-1
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror ) 1 child
So then there is no proof, then.

Thanks for admitting. You’ll figure it out eventually
Fabius on scored.co
1 month ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
People who say the moon landing isn't real are jews and non-whites who either can't believe or want to undermine the absolute majesty of White achievement.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Even if it was fake. What does it change? Nothing.

So it’s a distraction.
Niemo on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Of course they were real. White people did it.
albatrosv15 on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Totally.

> No human spaceflights other than the lunar missions of the Apollo program (1968–1972) have gone beyond LEO.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Earth_orbit

Now, if you an npc, just say "so what?" and we can move on with our lives.
el_hoovy on scored.co
1 month ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 2 children
> No human spaceflights other than the lunar missions of the Apollo program (1968–1972) have gone beyond LEO.

... er, yes, every mission that didn't go to the moon stayed near Earth.

1. as far as space science goes, anything a human can do in a super-high orbit, he can do in LEO. why spend and risk more to not achieve anything?
2. where else should they have been sent if not the moon? mars? orbiting the sun until they die? if they landed on the moon again to plant another flag (a colossal waste of effort once it's no longer a fresh achievement), wouldn't you just call that one fake too?

these are really basic failures of logic that completely undermine your argument. you should instead focus on how curious it is that they went to the moon right after nabbing all those German scientists and once they died off, so did space science.
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 month ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Really what killed off space science was the financialization of European/American civilization. Everything had to be for profit and/or anti-white "humanitarian" goals. $5 Trillion for starving Africans but can't invest in space because it's "wasteful".

The other thing is that NASA, while run by Germans and Euro-Americans, was steeped in civil rights bullshit from the start. Once that really took hold then things got shittier and more bloated fast.
Real_Uncle_Noticer on scored.co
1 month ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Roundabout way of saying jews killed it.
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 month ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
No disagreement there.
Real_Uncle_Noticer on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Oh no doubt. The statement is more for the normies reading. You've made good points in this thread so far.
-3
albatrosv15 on scored.co
1 month ago -3 points (+0 / -0 / -3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Moon altitude is 380 000 km. LEO altitude is 2 000 km. Yeah man, really wasteful to go beyond this.

> you should instead focus on how curious it is that they went to the moon right after nabbing all those German scientists and once they died off, so did space science.

Yeah man, muh supreme nazis, did something 6 times(went to the moon, retard) with very specific program and then poof nothing. No gradualness, just 380 000 km with this very specific program and not even beyond 2000 km before, during or after this.
SmallestShil on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Yes. Supreme Nazis.
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
is there a good microscope i can get for under $1000?

I wish i could do my own blood work. Like a DIY home medical lab.
Megaboom2025 on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
There’s military bases on the moon
Cstriker04 on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
White people should build a nuclear base on the moon to nuke africa and india and the middle east. Every country the genocidal rape apes come from. Kaboom. Wipe it out and colonize it when the radiation goes away. The chinese will probably send people over to colonize it first and endure the radiation and deny there is any radiation.
albatrosv15 on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
> when the radiation goes away.

Wait like 2 days, like Hiroshima bank did? They opened up 2 days after bombing while being 400 meters away from the center of the blast.
Cstriker04 on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Nuking India and Africa into ash will probably mean more radiation. But what would I know? I am no nukeologist.
Megaboom2025 on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
So basically WALL-e timeline
Thenoticingcontinues on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Landing on the moon? Hilarious.

Do you believe the holohoax too? Lol
contrarianism on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
moon landings totally fake dumbass
bobbacringo on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
It was totally real.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZgD89VYkVc
-2
CanticleFlugelhorn on scored.co
1 month ago -2 points (+0 / -0 / -2Score on mirror )
What is the real moons were the friends we made along the way?

And they're just as fake.
-2
SnakePlisken1776 on scored.co
1 month ago -2 points (+0 / -0 / -2Score on mirror ) 1 child
I ain’t never seen no germs.
teenager on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
hello there furry faggot
-2
kensai on scored.co
1 month ago -2 points (+0 / -0 / -2Score on mirror )
Holy fuck you guys are faggots. Just look at the videos, youre telling me that aluminum foil wrapped camping tent made it to the moon? Why is it ao hard for you guys to go yeah jews are bad, but they also lied about the moon landing, given you know, they lie about everything else and at the time oss -> cia pipeline + Hollywood made sure this was possible.

The fact youre unable to see this makes you a hyper tier retard.
-3
disoriented on scored.co
1 month ago -3 points (+0 / -0 / -3Score on mirror ) 3 children
>If you want to say there are no moon landings or germs seen under microscopes I will assume idf faggots paid you to say this.

Just like I assume IDF faggots paid you to say this.
11
el_hoovy on scored.co
1 month ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror )
the IDF would be very interested in making White Americans and literal former-nazi German scientists look really smart and capable, wouldn't they?
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 month ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
>you’re a jew because you don’t reject things your eyes can see

Neat, kill yourself.
Cstriker04 on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Why would the IDF waste money paying me to say the moon landings are real and we should be talking about jew crimes and how we need to kill all jews instead?

Think before you speak dumkopf.
-3
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago -3 points (+0 / -0 / -3Score on mirror ) 3 children
I’ll believe it when they do it, live steam it with multiple backups with front-facing dash cams, and have a private entrepreneur (no deepstate faggots) replicate the process.
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
At this point over half a dozen other countries, including rivals like China, have photographed Apollo landing sites. The landers are there, you can see the rovers left behind on the later missions. Thousands of people saw the rockets go up with their bare eyes. You can go in person to see Saturn V's today, unused LEMs, and actual Apollo capsules that survived re-entry.

The strongest evidence against gassings at Auschwitz is that it was not technically feasible as described, and there is critical physical evidence lacking today. The strongest evidence for the Moon landing is that it WAS technically feasible, and there are mounds of physical evidence around today.
-4
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago -4 points (+0 / -0 / -4Score on mirror )
That’s cool…. So where’s the dash cam footage?
albatrosv15 on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Yeah no, not anymore. AI will make everything on a screen true.
-1
bluewhiteandred on scored.co
1 month ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror ) 1 child
not responding to the other comment that replied but same for me, they simply won't livestream it and nasa keeps delaying "going back": https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20241206-nasa-delays-us-return-mission-moon-artemis-until-2027

\> two more weeks!
deleted 1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
bluewhiteandred on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
> a phone call to Nixon with zero delay

and somehow today people still have all kinds of cell phone calls drop!!! Why don't they just use this "mature" phone call technology...?!
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The radio delay time between Earth and the moon is about 1.25 seconds. So for a two-way delay you're looking at about 2.5-3 seconds. I'm linking an audio recording of the call. There are two instances of a two-way delay. One when Houston informs the astronauts of the call. The second after Nixon finishes his message and Neil Armstrong replies. The first delay is about 6-7 seconds, the second is about 8 seconds. More than enough time for the delay as well as a natural pause in conversation. The only thime when there is no delay in the conversation is when Houston control tells Nixon to go ahead, but that is a terrestrial communication from Texas to Washington D.C. Not the moon.

https://youtu.be/1Ai_HCBDQIQ
-1
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror )
No.
-4
bluewhiteandred on scored.co
1 month ago -4 points (+0 / -0 / -4Score on mirror ) 1 child
a landing so real that nasa keeps delaying going back:

https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20241206-nasa-delays-us-return-mission-moon-artemis-until-2027

and won't livestream a start-to-finish mission

(in 2027 they have the opportunity to prove their missions real, but I doubt they will)
greenspotbikes on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
George W. Bush announces the plan to return to the moon by 2020. (Jan 14, 2004.)

https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2004/01/20040114-3.html

For a nation that supposedly went to the moon numerous times, it shouldn't take more than 20 years to make the trip again.

I also don't think they will be able to do it by 2027.
Toast message