Just curious what people here think of this. If modern jews aren’t of the Bible and biblical jews have the blood of Christ on their hands…who has the blood of Christ on their hands today? Perhaps this ashkenazi race took the curse upon themselves? Anyways. I’ve been chewing on this dichotomy for a few years now but haven’t really done any sort of deep look as there’s many pieces to put together. Been listening to EMJ again the last few weeks. Someone called into his show and mentioned this and basically said it doesn’t really matter cause they’re the jews of today and there is the chain of custody so to speak that leads back to biblical jews even if racially they’re now different. It seemed hypocritical for me to blame modern jews for killing Jesus if they weren’t the actual people. But, modern jews seem to despise Jesus the same as the old ones, so maybe who cares is what I’m leaning towards? Anyways, just curious what you think. I’m not very bright lol
Not exactly true. They were run by King Herod.
The Pharisees were a sect of the religion that was somewhat popular. They were not in control, however.
You might be confusing the Pharisees with the Sanhedrin, which was a counsel that included pharisees and others. Somewhat akin to congress. The sanhedrin gains nominal control only because King Herod practically suicided his line.