Just curious what people here think of this. If modern jews aren’t of the Bible and biblical jews have the blood of Christ on their hands…who has the blood of Christ on their hands today? Perhaps this ashkenazi race took the curse upon themselves? Anyways. I’ve been chewing on this dichotomy for a few years now but haven’t really done any sort of deep look as there’s many pieces to put together. Been listening to EMJ again the last few weeks. Someone called into his show and mentioned this and basically said it doesn’t really matter cause they’re the jews of today and there is the chain of custody so to speak that leads back to biblical jews even if racially they’re now different. It seemed hypocritical for me to blame modern jews for killing Jesus if they weren’t the actual people. But, modern jews seem to despise Jesus the same as the old ones, so maybe who cares is what I’m leaning towards? Anyways, just curious what you think. I’m not very bright lol
1. **The Jews**: referring to the ancient Hebrews of the Old Testament, who didn’t call themselves this.
2. **The Jews**: referring to the descendants of the Pharisees who we all call ‘jews’ today; these are the ones who killed Jesus and were the only group that survived the Sack of Jerusalem and Hadrian’s wrath that caused the Diaspora. The Sadducees and Essenes all died out.
3. **The Jews**: referring to actual Christians, as per the writings of the original disciples, who wanted to ensure people understood the Pharisees had abandoned God and [weren’t part of their group](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%202:28-29&version=KJV) (that is, the heirs of the ancient Hebrews).