New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Just curious what people here think of this. If modern jews aren’t of the Bible and biblical jews have the blood of Christ on their hands…who has the blood of Christ on their hands today? Perhaps this ashkenazi race took the curse upon themselves? Anyways. I’ve been chewing on this dichotomy for a few years now but haven’t really done any sort of deep look as there’s many pieces to put together. Been listening to EMJ again the last few weeks. Someone called into his show and mentioned this and basically said it doesn’t really matter cause they’re the jews of today and there is the chain of custody so to speak that leads back to biblical jews even if racially they’re now different. It seemed hypocritical for me to blame modern jews for killing Jesus if they weren’t the actual people. But, modern jews seem to despise Jesus the same as the old ones, so maybe who cares is what I’m leaning towards? Anyways, just curious what you think. I’m not very bright lol
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
BreadandWinePilled on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
> Now when Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but rather that a riot was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd, saying, “I am innocent of this Man’s blood; you yourselves shall see.” And all the [assembled Jewish] people replied, “**His blood shall be on us and on our children!**”
-Matthew 27:24-25

Pretty open and shut, really.
Toast message