redditards
(media.scored.co)
Reminder that reddit is a literal MOSSAD operation
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
21 comments:
Loving someone as a human being, and sticking your dick in their ass are two different things. I guess it’s all the same to Reddit.
Yeah, if you like her so much just, I dunno, be friends?
By that logic murder is OK, because Jesus never said "Don't murder".
And honestly, I feel like Jesus probably did say that at some point (and don't be a faggot), but as John 21:25 says:
>Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written.
So those recording the gospels of Jesus probably excluded some of the stuff they thought as "too outlandish to need to be written down." Kinda like the Founders and the Constitution - there was no need to go overboard about White Christian civilization in there, because the entire founding stock of the country was White Christian, so that's who they wrote the rules for.
>Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written.
So those recording the gospels of Jesus probably excluded some of the stuff they thought as "too outlandish to need to be written down." Kinda like the Founders and the Constitution - there was no need to go overboard about White Christian civilization in there, because the entire founding stock of the country was White Christian, so that's who they wrote the rules for.
Fascinating that an atheistic, degenerate cesspit like Reddit is so opinionated on who Jesus is or was. When the right context arises, they suddenly fancy themselves to be the greatest experts on the Jesus question. These ignoble anthropoid vermin have no idea about anything, and are only interested in justifying and rationalizing their degenerate desires. Consequently, the notion of hippie Jesus remains alive and well at Reddit, because hippie Jesus is someone who, when they attempt to envisage him, was merely some brown, drug-smoking, proto-communist buffoon who went around saying 'Dude, weed... peace and love, and, like, communism, man' in between exhaling copious clouds of smoke from a hookah or whatever people may have smoked at the time.
Someone who fits that description would indeed likely have an unconditional tolerance for everything except intolerance; that is, hippie Jesus is simply made in the image not of God but of degenerate man. We know this because we can see degenerates like Jeffrey Marsh actively creating him in real-time, claiming that he was 'trans' and 'non-binary' and whatever else. But such anthropoid vermin did not begin creating hippie Jesus out of the blue, rather, they're merely continuing an ages-old intergenerational process. As they get more twisted, their minds attribute increasing twistedness to hippie Jesus.
Is it a coincidence that hippie Jesus gives a free pass to all of their incessant nonsense? No, for it is implausible that a man living 2,000 years ago would even know let alone agree with all of the rubbish that people believe 2,000 years later. Unless he had great power of foresight, he would have no idea of the kind of nonsense that abounds in late-modernity, let alone that they would palm much of it off in his name. Rather, hippie Jesus permits all forms of degeneracy precisely because he is a social construct of degenerates, who created him and are continuing to create him, for the simple reason that taking ownership of an esteemed figure such as Jesus allows them to associate goodness with, and assuage guilt for, their having and acting out on degenerate desires. 'If even Jesus himself would not disapprove of what I am doing, why am I beginning to feel guilty or wrong for it? Therefore, I should not be feeling guilty or wrong.'
Hippie Jesus is a coping mechanism for the degenerate, no different to the myriad alcohols and drugs whose usage they justify in his name. A coping mechanism justifying other coping mechanisms. Whoever or whatever Jesus was, believing that degenerates have something correct to say about him is completely idiotic. You do not trust what degenerates write or say, *ever*. Just as you would never trust what 'Christian' drug cartels like Brazil's TCP have to say about religion, you should never trust what some degenerate on Reddit has to say about religion either. Actually, you should trust Redditors even less, since they are nobodies as well as degenerates, whereas drug cartel members are at least 'somebodies'. Redditors are the last people one should ever take as a guide: absolute nobodies with exceptionally dim intellect and grossly deficient moral character.
Someone who fits that description would indeed likely have an unconditional tolerance for everything except intolerance; that is, hippie Jesus is simply made in the image not of God but of degenerate man. We know this because we can see degenerates like Jeffrey Marsh actively creating him in real-time, claiming that he was 'trans' and 'non-binary' and whatever else. But such anthropoid vermin did not begin creating hippie Jesus out of the blue, rather, they're merely continuing an ages-old intergenerational process. As they get more twisted, their minds attribute increasing twistedness to hippie Jesus.
Is it a coincidence that hippie Jesus gives a free pass to all of their incessant nonsense? No, for it is implausible that a man living 2,000 years ago would even know let alone agree with all of the rubbish that people believe 2,000 years later. Unless he had great power of foresight, he would have no idea of the kind of nonsense that abounds in late-modernity, let alone that they would palm much of it off in his name. Rather, hippie Jesus permits all forms of degeneracy precisely because he is a social construct of degenerates, who created him and are continuing to create him, for the simple reason that taking ownership of an esteemed figure such as Jesus allows them to associate goodness with, and assuage guilt for, their having and acting out on degenerate desires. 'If even Jesus himself would not disapprove of what I am doing, why am I beginning to feel guilty or wrong for it? Therefore, I should not be feeling guilty or wrong.'
Hippie Jesus is a coping mechanism for the degenerate, no different to the myriad alcohols and drugs whose usage they justify in his name. A coping mechanism justifying other coping mechanisms. Whoever or whatever Jesus was, believing that degenerates have something correct to say about him is completely idiotic. You do not trust what degenerates write or say, *ever*. Just as you would never trust what 'Christian' drug cartels like Brazil's TCP have to say about religion, you should never trust what some degenerate on Reddit has to say about religion either. Actually, you should trust Redditors even less, since they are nobodies as well as degenerates, whereas drug cartel members are at least 'somebodies'. Redditors are the last people one should ever take as a guide: absolute nobodies with exceptionally dim intellect and grossly deficient moral character.
> "I grew up in a catholic school"
these "catholic" schools sadly aren't so Catholic
not saying that this can't come about if you do have good Catholic schooling but how many random old people became gay after getting a solid education and with solid parenting?
Red flag that she has the cognitive dissonance of "being religious" and "supporting gay rights" (even if there's lolbertarian tolerance of gays, still she seems to have not been taught a kind of revulsion towards sins of these kinds)
these "catholic" schools sadly aren't so Catholic
not saying that this can't come about if you do have good Catholic schooling but how many random old people became gay after getting a solid education and with solid parenting?
Red flag that she has the cognitive dissonance of "being religious" and "supporting gay rights" (even if there's lolbertarian tolerance of gays, still she seems to have not been taught a kind of revulsion towards sins of these kinds)
God has been consistently clear on where He stands on these issues.
> *"But ‘God made them male and female’ from the beginning of creation. This explains why a man leaves his father and mother and is joined to his wife, and the two are united into one. Since they are no longer two but one, let no one split apart what God has joined together.”* – Mark 10:6-9
> *“Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin."* – Leviticus 18:22
> *“If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense."* – Leviticus 20:13
> *"Don’t you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don’t fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes, or practice homosexuality, or are thieves, or greedy people, or drunkards, or are abusive, or cheat people—none of these will inherit the Kingdom of God."* – 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
> *"And don’t forget Sodom and Gomorrah and their neighboring towns, which were filled with immorality and every kind of sexual perversion. Those cities were destroyed by fire and serve as a warning of the eternal fire of God’s judgment."* – Jude 7
> *“Don’t imagine that I came to bring peace to the earth! I came not to bring peace, but a sword."* – Matthew 10:34
And finally, if you want to hear clarity on God's Anger at immorality and sin and wickedness that 100% still rings true today, [go read Romans 1:18-32](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%201%3A18-32&version=NLT). You'll swear you're reading about modern atheist leftists, consumed with hatred and self-pity and mental illness, dressing as furries at their "pride" parades, doing vile and degrading things to each other, while encouraging and grooming others to do these things too.
Evil exists and is consuming this world.
> *"But ‘God made them male and female’ from the beginning of creation. This explains why a man leaves his father and mother and is joined to his wife, and the two are united into one. Since they are no longer two but one, let no one split apart what God has joined together.”* – Mark 10:6-9
> *“Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin."* – Leviticus 18:22
> *“If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense."* – Leviticus 20:13
> *"Don’t you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don’t fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes, or practice homosexuality, or are thieves, or greedy people, or drunkards, or are abusive, or cheat people—none of these will inherit the Kingdom of God."* – 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
> *"And don’t forget Sodom and Gomorrah and their neighboring towns, which were filled with immorality and every kind of sexual perversion. Those cities were destroyed by fire and serve as a warning of the eternal fire of God’s judgment."* – Jude 7
> *“Don’t imagine that I came to bring peace to the earth! I came not to bring peace, but a sword."* – Matthew 10:34
And finally, if you want to hear clarity on God's Anger at immorality and sin and wickedness that 100% still rings true today, [go read Romans 1:18-32](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%201%3A18-32&version=NLT). You'll swear you're reading about modern atheist leftists, consumed with hatred and self-pity and mental illness, dressing as furries at their "pride" parades, doing vile and degrading things to each other, while encouraging and grooming others to do these things too.
Evil exists and is consuming this world.
Also:
> [1 Timothy 1:9-11] We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine that conforms to the gospel concerning the glory of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me. (NIV)
The Quran also contains verses in which homosexuality is clearly condemned by Lot, the prophet and messenger of God. For example:
> [Quran 29:28-29] Lot said to his people, "You commit such an abomination, no one in the world has ever done it before you. You practice sex with the men, you commit highway robbery, and you allow all kinds of vice in your society." The only response from his people was to say, "Bring to us GOD's retribution, if you are truthful." (tr. Rashad Khalifa)
Somehow, degenerates have been able to completely twist all of this obvious problematization of homosexuality into something else. Let us focus on Lot's people. Here, for instance, Gore Vidal tried to twist the destruction of Sodom into a problematization of, a punishment for, its inhabitants' rapaciousness. He writes:
> ... Sodom was destroyed not because the inhabitants were homosexualists but because a number of local men wanted to gang rape a pair of male angels who were guests of the town. That was a violation of the most sacred of ancient taboos: the law of hospitality. Also, gang rape, whether homosexual or heterosexual, is seldom agreeable in the eyes of any deity.
This interpretation is revealed as forced when considered in light of these verses. These verses are not about rape. They are clearly and unambiguously about homosexuality. Ask yourself how a substantial 'number of local men' could openly gather together to 'gang rape a pair of male angels' if homosexuality wasn't completely normalized in Sodom. Firstly, there would not be enough 'local men' interested in such a thing for any substantial number of them to gather in one place, that is, outside Lot's house; secondly, even if there were enough homosexual 'local men', they would not be accustomed to the idea that they can just casually gather together to do such a thing in the first place. That is, it sounds like the 'local men' have prior experience in doing such things. When Lot offers his daughters to them in place of the male angels, in the hope that this will lead the two male angels to be spared, notice that the 'local men' are not interested in raping them. It is obvious then that they weren't interested in just raping anything, but only what appeared to them to be human males.
That Sodom was destroyed because of the rapaciousness rather than the homosexuality of its inhabitants thus strikes me as an untenable claim. This wasn't about messing with the two wrong angels or violating the 'law of hospitality'. Lot could not find any good people left in the city: this was something a long time coming. Our views are consonant with both the Biblical and Quranic accounts. Views such as those of the aforementioned Gore Vidal, by contrast, are consonant merely with the motivated reasoning of degenerates.
> [1 Timothy 1:9-11] We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine that conforms to the gospel concerning the glory of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me. (NIV)
The Quran also contains verses in which homosexuality is clearly condemned by Lot, the prophet and messenger of God. For example:
> [Quran 29:28-29] Lot said to his people, "You commit such an abomination, no one in the world has ever done it before you. You practice sex with the men, you commit highway robbery, and you allow all kinds of vice in your society." The only response from his people was to say, "Bring to us GOD's retribution, if you are truthful." (tr. Rashad Khalifa)
Somehow, degenerates have been able to completely twist all of this obvious problematization of homosexuality into something else. Let us focus on Lot's people. Here, for instance, Gore Vidal tried to twist the destruction of Sodom into a problematization of, a punishment for, its inhabitants' rapaciousness. He writes:
> ... Sodom was destroyed not because the inhabitants were homosexualists but because a number of local men wanted to gang rape a pair of male angels who were guests of the town. That was a violation of the most sacred of ancient taboos: the law of hospitality. Also, gang rape, whether homosexual or heterosexual, is seldom agreeable in the eyes of any deity.
This interpretation is revealed as forced when considered in light of these verses. These verses are not about rape. They are clearly and unambiguously about homosexuality. Ask yourself how a substantial 'number of local men' could openly gather together to 'gang rape a pair of male angels' if homosexuality wasn't completely normalized in Sodom. Firstly, there would not be enough 'local men' interested in such a thing for any substantial number of them to gather in one place, that is, outside Lot's house; secondly, even if there were enough homosexual 'local men', they would not be accustomed to the idea that they can just casually gather together to do such a thing in the first place. That is, it sounds like the 'local men' have prior experience in doing such things. When Lot offers his daughters to them in place of the male angels, in the hope that this will lead the two male angels to be spared, notice that the 'local men' are not interested in raping them. It is obvious then that they weren't interested in just raping anything, but only what appeared to them to be human males.
That Sodom was destroyed because of the rapaciousness rather than the homosexuality of its inhabitants thus strikes me as an untenable claim. This wasn't about messing with the two wrong angels or violating the 'law of hospitality'. Lot could not find any good people left in the city: this was something a long time coming. Our views are consonant with both the Biblical and Quranic accounts. Views such as those of the aforementioned Gore Vidal, by contrast, are consonant merely with the motivated reasoning of degenerates.
These demonic freaks will answer for this kind of behaviour in the next life.
I fear for the wrath they will have to endure, but also delight in the death of the wicked.
I fear for the wrath they will have to endure, but also delight in the death of the wicked.
Honestly I was figuring the comments would all be calling for the OP to be killed for being a "pedophile"(for attraction to a physically developed woman of legal age), Didn't even realize that the OP was claiming to be a woman, I figured it was just a lonely young man who's been browbeaten by reddit into viewing himself as a pedophile for wanting a woman under 40.
Toast message
Another white man deprived of a wife
Another excuse for jews to flood the country with niggers
Another welfare collecting piece of shit woman
Two more white men deprived of wives if you count the other girl.