You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
24 days ago0 points(+0/-0)2 children
Which means he believes in terrain theory only. He may in fact believe that bacteria dont have an effect on humans or whatever. Idk im not him. But terrain theory does not say that bacteria dont exist. It says that they arent the cause of sickness. I personally believe that viruses dont exist, that they are exosomes from dying cells that cause cascade effects in the body on a cellular level, and that dying bacteria in our bodies can cause those same responses. Like I said, a blend of the two. They dont have to be mutually exclusive.
We dont see *viruses* doing that. And we dont see bacteria doing that either.
We DO see bacteria invading the body and then see a response. Terrain theory posits that the bacteria dying releases matter that causes cellular response if the body is disregulated. Its essentially a different way to look at the underlying cause of the same phenomena.
We have never seen a live virus. You cant see living things in an electron microscope.
Not of the same thing. Any "sequence of action" captured my electron microscope would be different samples cooled together.
Look, im not saying it isn't right. Im saying that there are flaws in the theory that need to be understood and addressed, and we as critical thinking white men need to be made aware that these questions exist and have validity. This shouldn't be an either or argument but a collaborative discussion.
23 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Yes there would be multiple stages of action seen within a single sample due to the size of microbiology.
I believe that elements of terrain theory are demonstrated within germ theory, as in immune compromise and opportunistic infection, all infection can be see as opportunistic, but I don't see there being the generation of pathogens from benign microbes due to the presence of diseased tissue. The microbial nature doesn't change, just the body's ability to regulate it. So in times of dysfunction, infectious pathogens become overpopulated and cause symptoms. You can see that with candida where it exists naturally on our skin but becomes a yeast infection when overgrown.
Terrain theory says that bacteria are a stage of development of microorganisms that exist within us already in a benign state and just transform upon arrival at diseased tissue into a pathogen. So if you see the bacteria arriving and causing disease you are a proponent of germ theory.
The same electron microscope images you have to prove that viruses exist. You cant take a live image of anything with an electron microscope. They see this tiny thing and say "that's a virus and it does this". The exact same thing can be described a different way. The phenomena is the same. The treatment and prevention approach are different.
We DO see bacteria invading the body and then see a response. Terrain theory posits that the bacteria dying releases matter that causes cellular response if the body is disregulated. Its essentially a different way to look at the underlying cause of the same phenomena.
We have never seen a live virus. You cant see living things in an electron microscope.
Look, im not saying it isn't right. Im saying that there are flaws in the theory that need to be understood and addressed, and we as critical thinking white men need to be made aware that these questions exist and have validity. This shouldn't be an either or argument but a collaborative discussion.
I believe that elements of terrain theory are demonstrated within germ theory, as in immune compromise and opportunistic infection, all infection can be see as opportunistic, but I don't see there being the generation of pathogens from benign microbes due to the presence of diseased tissue. The microbial nature doesn't change, just the body's ability to regulate it. So in times of dysfunction, infectious pathogens become overpopulated and cause symptoms. You can see that with candida where it exists naturally on our skin but becomes a yeast infection when overgrown.