New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
35
posted 24 days ago by ScallionPancake on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +35Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
ScallionPancake on scored.co
24 days ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 2 children
GenesisSOC does.
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
24 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
No, he said viruses dont exist.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
24 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
No he said:

> Germ theory is a jewish hoax

Butttoucha9k on scored.co
23 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Which means he believes in terrain theory only. He may in fact believe that bacteria dont have an effect on humans or whatever. Idk im not him. But terrain theory does not say that bacteria dont exist. It says that they arent the cause of sickness. I personally believe that viruses dont exist, that they are exosomes from dying cells that cause cascade effects in the body on a cellular level, and that dying bacteria in our bodies can cause those same responses. Like I said, a blend of the two. They dont have to be mutually exclusive.
Niemo on scored.co
23 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
I just don't understand how we can observe microscopically, germs invading destroying and reproducing and then say that damage isn't causing illness.
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
23 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
We dont see *viruses* doing that. And we dont see bacteria doing that either.

We DO see bacteria invading the body and then see a response. Terrain theory posits that the bacteria dying releases matter that causes cellular response if the body is disregulated. Its essentially a different way to look at the underlying cause of the same phenomena.

We have never seen a live virus. You cant see living things in an electron microscope.


WeedleTLiar on scored.co
23 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Honest question, what proof do you have that exosomes exist that you don't have for virus' existing?
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
23 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The same electron microscope images you have to prove that viruses exist. You cant take a live image of anything with an electron microscope. They see this tiny thing and say "that's a virus and it does this". The exact same thing can be described a different way. The phenomena is the same. The treatment and prevention approach are different.
-5
genesisSOC on scored.co
23 days ago -5 points (+0 / -0 / -5Score on mirror ) 1 child
I never said bacteria doesn't exist. Bacteria does exist, it's just not the sole cause of any disease or illness. Blaming bacteria for disease is like blaming fire fighters for the fire when they show up to put out the fire, or blaming cops for the crime that niggers commit when they show up to deal with it. *Viruses* don't exist because they've never been proven, same with *germs*. How much of a fucking 45 vaccinated retarded nigger faggot jew are you to think bacteria is the same *viruses* or *germs*?
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
23 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The term "germ" is a generic catch-all for microscopic particles that interact with biological systems. Like "bugs" covers insects and spiders, bacteria and virus' are both germs.
-2
genesisSOC on scored.co
23 days ago -2 points (+0 / -0 / -2Score on mirror )
And that's the problem. Unlike bacteria, "viruses" and "germs" don't exist. And how the jew told you to view bacteria isn't true.
Toast message