You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
MartinRigggs on scored.co
1 month ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Idk man, they could’ve chosen Charlie in order to trigger the most widespread impact possible knowing his death would bother everyone on the right aside from the jew naming section of the right because they could spin the narrative to say “if the lunatic left enjoys seeing a very moderate Republican being murdered, if they believe he was a Nazi, doesn’t that mean they’d support the mass murder of all republicans because they see every last one of us as Nazis?”. If their goal is to create even more left Vs right tension among the goycattle in hopes that they can inspire actual terrorist acts between the blue and red goycattle, or even if they wanted to have a believable backstory for when their next mossad orchestrated false flag political assassination happens, they’d choose to hit somebody like Kirk simply because he’s a moderate Republican who the average Republican can identify with. Who would be more beneficial for jews to assassinate than Kirk?
All correct, but there is a flip side:
White Supremacists are in the extreme wings of political discourse, so making politics more nasty and polarized and even violent benefits us.
The more civic nationalists understand that there is no dialogue with leftists, the better it is for us.
White Supremacists are in the extreme wings of political discourse, so making politics more nasty and polarized and even violent benefits us.
The more civic nationalists understand that there is no dialogue with leftists, the better it is for us.
Apathy from normies is our biggest obstacle.