Charlie Kirk on BlackRock
(twitter.com)
Even if he didn’t realize it, that was extremely antisemitic.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
17 comments:
12
7 months ago
12 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+12Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
I remember seeing this clip, pretty sure it’s a couple years old. We absolutely should bar all corporations from buying houses or multifamily rental properties, but that would require the common man to have a voice in this government and we don’t. Larry Fink and his buddies run this shit show. The immigration issue (illegal and legal alike) plays into the housing problem big time also. Think about how many millions of non-Whites are in this nation, they all need housing, now imagine if we successfully removed let’s say 20% of them, housing prices would plummet immediately, and we’d all be able to afford housing, or at the very least, we’d be able to afford rent with a shitty job and still be able to save some money to one day buy a house.
Housing prices plummeting also affects the everyman that already owns a home, not just corporations. Imagine you bought and paid off your house, are about to retire and buy a flat in florida or something since you don't need your 5000sqft house anymore) and suddenly it's worth 50% less because corporations were forced to sell? You can't just up and fuck normal families that already own homes just so some blue-haired socialist 25 year old can buy a flat. Right now the biggest problem with the housing market is interest rates on mortgages, not *just* the prices.
Hell, my father is in this situation. Lives alone in like 6500sqft or something, was getting ready to retire and the housing market suddenly died due to high interest rates. He'd have to sell it for much less then he was expecting to, so he suddenly can't retire or at least would have to do so with a much smaller nest egg after a life of hard construction work.
Hell, my father is in this situation. Lives alone in like 6500sqft or something, was getting ready to retire and the housing market suddenly died due to high interest rates. He'd have to sell it for much less then he was expecting to, so he suddenly can't retire or at least would have to do so with a much smaller nest egg after a life of hard construction work.
Except most people in the situation your describing bought their house back before the prices went up so they are still making money compared to when they bought, oh no they didn't get to make a killing selling their house.
Most? Maybe, but not all. What about the families that were gonna use that money to send their kids to college, buy their children a flat, retire, fulfill their dreams after a life of work? What about the families that bought 3 months ago, took out some ridiculous mortgage and will suddenly be underwater when their house is worth 30% less?
You're getting hung up on the trolley problem. Everyone can't win, sorry to say it to you but these people you speak of are just on the wrong side of the solution.
Only a problem for boomers
Dislike boomers all you want but it seems a little unfair to work your entire life and have a chunk of your retirement fund ganked out from under you right at the end.
I'm not a boomer, have a home and it's paid off - causing real estate prices to plummet is effectively forcing me to subsidize a 25 year old leftist being able to buy a flat (and pay interest, of course, since they'll need a mortgage).
Now that I think about it, it's really the banks that would come out on top more then anyone here. A whole generation of new debtors paying off 25 year loans.
I'm not a boomer, have a home and it's paid off - causing real estate prices to plummet is effectively forcing me to subsidize a 25 year old leftist being able to buy a flat (and pay interest, of course, since they'll need a mortgage).
Now that I think about it, it's really the banks that would come out on top more then anyone here. A whole generation of new debtors paying off 25 year loans.
That’s the cost of living their entire lives on easy mode for boomers, who fuckin cares if they don’t get to maximize profits off of their house? They’re the ones who decimated the economy, and they’re all on their way out in about a decade, so if it means they have to lose a little bit of profit just so other Americans can actually afford a home, so be it. It’s not like they’re going to finish off life homeless, but for the younger gen’s, plenty of them are already homeless because of the situation we were put in.
This wouldnt work. The jews would just make smaller secret subsidiary companies that manage $499B in assets. When caught 10 years later, they would clog up the courts with litigation. Eventually, maybe they'd pay a $20M fine only after making $1 trillion.
I agree with Kirk, I disagree wtih the other guy that corporations in general should not be able to buy single family homes.
There is an argument to buying a single family home as an LLC registered in a state where there is charging order protection as a way to protecting your biggest asset (your home) from the foreskin-deficient.
There is an argument to buying a single family home as an LLC registered in a state where there is charging order protection as a way to protecting your biggest asset (your home) from the foreskin-deficient.
there's a difference between owning ONE home or 50 or 100. You get much less market leverage with one home
Right - i'm just saying a blanket ban on LLC's owning single-family homes wouldn't be an ideal solution.
With that said, there really isn't a solution anymore. What can you do if corporations already own X number of homes? You can't say no one else can buy from now on because they the ones that already own properties like that have a competitive advantage. You can't force them to sell either because the government would be responsible for potential loses + forcing a fire-sale by blackrock would fuck the housing market by dropping prices like crazy (which would of course also affect a normal family selling their house to upsize/downsize/whatever).
With that said, there really isn't a solution anymore. What can you do if corporations already own X number of homes? You can't say no one else can buy from now on because they the ones that already own properties like that have a competitive advantage. You can't force them to sell either because the government would be responsible for potential loses + forcing a fire-sale by blackrock would fuck the housing market by dropping prices like crazy (which would of course also affect a normal family selling their house to upsize/downsize/whatever).
Toast message