You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 month ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Nope, it depends on who’s doing the inciting. This is where the left has been way ahead of us, especially now considering the situations we’re in. They were never intellectually consistent and arguing in good faith. I’ve stopped playing that game too a while ago, and only save such liberties for inner circle frens, and 80%ers. Thanks to CKs assassination, and the reaction and celebration to it by so many demons, many more “conservatives” now understand there is no treating these demons like fellow humans any longer. It’s been a huge white pill to me.
Edit: It’s kind of relevant, but do you still believe in freedom of speech in our current kiked mongrelized “melting pot”? Not trying to be argumentative, just genuinely curious since we’re amongst frens.
I know I'm not who you were replying to but I agree with the sentiment against freedom of speech. I honestly really value freedom of speech but it hasn't actually been doing people any good for a while. And it's not just about all the shitskins amongst us. It allowed for consistent propaganda to demoralize everyone, including white people, for decades. I value truth and freedom of speech shows for the truth to be spoken but it also allows for it to be drowned in a sea of bullshit. When it comes down to it I think the real problem is that the freedoms granted to people by the constitution were underpinned by the assumption that the people being granted those freedoms would be of a decent enough character that they would feel a duty to use those freedoms for good. The framers also probably couldn't have conceived of something like the internet where every retard has the potential to reach out to the whole world with lies. Freedom of speech is a lot less dangerous when only people within earshot can hear you and at least the cost of printing would naturally curtail someone's ability to have people reading their ideas. The same thing applies to voting. It was white , male land owners only for a long time. That ensured that people making decisions about who was capable of good governance were qualified because they themselves were capable of governing their own businesses and families well enough to keep them. Freedom is just anarchy unless those given it are capable of imposing order on themselves to some degree.
Edit: It’s kind of relevant, but do you still believe in freedom of speech in our current kiked mongrelized “melting pot”? Not trying to be argumentative, just genuinely curious since we’re amongst frens.