This might be quite a common thought, be let me reiterate it, just to be sure. This is my theory:
For a long time Kirk was a jew-loving zionist, a staunch defender of jews and israel, and it might have been a genuine impulse, because somehow that's the default setting for many people - to believe the jewish media. But it appears in recent time he started to notice beyond what is permitted. The expected course was that his large following would also change their minds along with him, slowly discovering the jewish problem together. He was very milquetoast and wanted to debate and talk, and that was a very dangerous problem for the jews. Someone like him turning on them is a recipe for disaster. The problem could have developed over multiple years though, but the tendency appeared to be that he'd become quite aware of the jewish problem. And he'd basically just stumble into it. At some point he'd stop shutting down the "antisemitic" voices, he'd start to talk with people like Fuentes.
They can handle vile leftists hating israel for genociding their beloved sandniggers, who do not want to be labeled antisemitic at any costs, as that would go against their idiotic principles of... whatever the fuck, who cares. They can handle the relatively low amount of us, because we don't have sufficient means to use the media (which they make sure we don't have), and they can spin their narratives about us uncontested - calling us leftists for conservatives, or just White Supremacists for both. It's not like the leftists need much reason to oppose us anyway. But genuine conservatives who by default are either neutral or supportive of jews? Kirk was too mainstream, with too much influence. That was a big problem for them.
So they (israel, Netanyahu, Mossad) decided to assassinate him while he was still known as a good goy zionist, before he could turn on them.
---
Let's dig into evidences. [Here](https://dailycaller.com/2025/09/11/benjamin-netanyahu-mourns-charlie-kirk/) is a page that contains this:
> “You know, he wrote me this letter in, I think, May 2, and he says one of my greatest joys as a Christian is advocating for Israel and forming alliances to defend Judeo-Christian civilization,” Netanyahu said when asked about his relationship with Kirk.
We have the devil in chief capitalizing on his death, pushing this ridiculous "Judeo-Christian" nonsense, praising him for THAT of all things.
From Yandex AI:
> Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wrote about Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, shortly after the assassination of the conservative activist. In his tweet, Netanyahu expressed his sorrow over Kirk's death and called him a "great friend of Israel".
Also [this](https://www.indiatimes.com/trending/did-israel-kill-charlie-kirk-pm-benjamin-netanyahus-tweets-about-the-ring-wing-activist-sparks-explosive-conspiracy-theories-on-social-media-669907.html) article expands on this well:
> Netizens noticed that Netanyahu tweeted about Kirk’s death 20 minutes before any American news outlet or even former President Donald Trump confirmed the tragedy. This unusual timing has left many questioning whether there is more to the story than what has been officially revealed.
How did a leader of a country, supposedly busy all the time, know about this before even Americans themselves knew about this? It's either arrogance or idiocy. He was probably already eagerly waiting for the "mission complete" confirmation to occur, and wanted to be the first to post it to try to make himself look innocent. And why did he even post anything about it? If I'd commit a murder, I wouldn't be so idiotically sloppy like him. This is something a Colombo would easily expose - it wouldn't even make a 40 minute movie, unless the plot was that the challenge was to prevent the murderer from getting away abroad.
> Kirk had recently become outspoken about the Jeffrey Epstein files, pushing for the release of documents that allegedly link powerful global figures to Epstein’s crimes. Some online believe his activism may have made him a target.
> According to online sleuths, Kirk was invited to Israel by Netanyahu just two weeks before the shooting. Reports also surfaced of Kirk privately telling friends that he feared retaliation if he “stepped out of line” with his criticism of Israel.
This shows that he was a thorn on the side of the jews. He meddled with things that were too dangerous for them. And with the increase in noticing, he had to be ended. Either they take the hit and let him turn millions of conservatives against israel and therefore jews, or they ended him while he was still seen as a zionist.
This vicious, murderous behavior is common for jews, so it all fits together. Remember the USS Liberty. They really LOVE to kill people if it serves their agendas. OR: We just assume some random leftist executed a perfect assassination, who despite being a deranged leftist managed to pull off quite a feat. To do that is quite common for military trained personnel though - just a sniper with all the information needed to hide his identity. Kill the target, escape, do not get caught. Let the goyim wonder what happened, but never have clarity.
This is not a trial, not a court, and *in dubio pro reo* does not apply. It was the jews, namely Netanyahu, with a very high chance. It is on them to prove their innocence. However, ironically I do not trust the jews, and neither should anyone. So let's settle on this: It was the jews.
For a long time Kirk was a jew-loving zionist, a staunch defender of jews and israel, and it might have been a genuine impulse, because somehow that's the default setting for many people - to believe the jewish media. But it appears in recent time he started to notice beyond what is permitted. The expected course was that his large following would also change their minds along with him, slowly discovering the jewish problem together. He was very milquetoast and wanted to debate and talk, and that was a very dangerous problem for the jews. Someone like him turning on them is a recipe for disaster. The problem could have developed over multiple years though, but the tendency appeared to be that he'd become quite aware of the jewish problem. And he'd basically just stumble into it. At some point he'd stop shutting down the "antisemitic" voices, he'd start to talk with people like Fuentes.
They can handle vile leftists hating israel for genociding their beloved sandniggers, who do not want to be labeled antisemitic at any costs, as that would go against their idiotic principles of... whatever the fuck, who cares. They can handle the relatively low amount of us, because we don't have sufficient means to use the media (which they make sure we don't have), and they can spin their narratives about us uncontested - calling us leftists for conservatives, or just White Supremacists for both. It's not like the leftists need much reason to oppose us anyway. But genuine conservatives who by default are either neutral or supportive of jews? Kirk was too mainstream, with too much influence. That was a big problem for them.
So they (israel, Netanyahu, Mossad) decided to assassinate him while he was still known as a good goy zionist, before he could turn on them.
---
Let's dig into evidences. [Here](https://dailycaller.com/2025/09/11/benjamin-netanyahu-mourns-charlie-kirk/) is a page that contains this:
> “You know, he wrote me this letter in, I think, May 2, and he says one of my greatest joys as a Christian is advocating for Israel and forming alliances to defend Judeo-Christian civilization,” Netanyahu said when asked about his relationship with Kirk.
We have the devil in chief capitalizing on his death, pushing this ridiculous "Judeo-Christian" nonsense, praising him for THAT of all things.
From Yandex AI:
> Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wrote about Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, shortly after the assassination of the conservative activist. In his tweet, Netanyahu expressed his sorrow over Kirk's death and called him a "great friend of Israel".
Also [this](https://www.indiatimes.com/trending/did-israel-kill-charlie-kirk-pm-benjamin-netanyahus-tweets-about-the-ring-wing-activist-sparks-explosive-conspiracy-theories-on-social-media-669907.html) article expands on this well:
> Netizens noticed that Netanyahu tweeted about Kirk’s death 20 minutes before any American news outlet or even former President Donald Trump confirmed the tragedy. This unusual timing has left many questioning whether there is more to the story than what has been officially revealed.
How did a leader of a country, supposedly busy all the time, know about this before even Americans themselves knew about this? It's either arrogance or idiocy. He was probably already eagerly waiting for the "mission complete" confirmation to occur, and wanted to be the first to post it to try to make himself look innocent. And why did he even post anything about it? If I'd commit a murder, I wouldn't be so idiotically sloppy like him. This is something a Colombo would easily expose - it wouldn't even make a 40 minute movie, unless the plot was that the challenge was to prevent the murderer from getting away abroad.
> Kirk had recently become outspoken about the Jeffrey Epstein files, pushing for the release of documents that allegedly link powerful global figures to Epstein’s crimes. Some online believe his activism may have made him a target.
> According to online sleuths, Kirk was invited to Israel by Netanyahu just two weeks before the shooting. Reports also surfaced of Kirk privately telling friends that he feared retaliation if he “stepped out of line” with his criticism of Israel.
This shows that he was a thorn on the side of the jews. He meddled with things that were too dangerous for them. And with the increase in noticing, he had to be ended. Either they take the hit and let him turn millions of conservatives against israel and therefore jews, or they ended him while he was still seen as a zionist.
This vicious, murderous behavior is common for jews, so it all fits together. Remember the USS Liberty. They really LOVE to kill people if it serves their agendas. OR: We just assume some random leftist executed a perfect assassination, who despite being a deranged leftist managed to pull off quite a feat. To do that is quite common for military trained personnel though - just a sniper with all the information needed to hide his identity. Kill the target, escape, do not get caught. Let the goyim wonder what happened, but never have clarity.
This is not a trial, not a court, and *in dubio pro reo* does not apply. It was the jews, namely Netanyahu, with a very high chance. It is on them to prove their innocence. However, ironically I do not trust the jews, and neither should anyone. So let's settle on this: It was the jews.
True, but they're calculated where it counts. If they acted on impulse alone, they wouldn't be over us right now. They're very good at playing the long game and being cunning
>Which might not have worked if he operated on a genuine level, not as a shill, but saying what he believed is true. To change that means changing how he presents himself in public
He was operating as a shill for over a decade. He's on the aipac funding list. He probably got a pretty healthy warning before he even became a commentator. He put himself in deep with evil people and there was no way out, it's a cartel. But a threat against his family, that he 100% knows would be completely legitimate, would have 9 times out of 10 worked pretty damned well.
>Maybe the sum of all factors was the reason. He turned into a thorn, killing him was a great distraction and it might have caused infighting. They wouldn't kill an asset just for distraction, but he became an ideal target for them.
He hadn't even become a thorn yet, he said something vaguely criticizing israel a single time (at least verifiably). It's not just for mere distraction purposes though, it was to turn the entirety of American politics from noticing back to repub vs Democrat again. Realpolitik had been moving away from this dichotomy because trump has been fucking up a lot lately and he caused a schism within the Maga movement, meanwhile the radical leftists have been filtering out of the democrats for a while also, those 2 elements converged somewhere in the tucker Carlson (and nick fuentes too, but a bit less) type conservatism. What happened when dissident conservatives and reactionaries started having discourse with dissident leftists? This little movement in Italy and Germany called fascism and national socialism. No doubt jews would be scared about the convergent evolution of fascism in America, and they know their history too.
What happened now that kirk is dead? People are back into repeating the talking points of their jewish parties again.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Well, they play war games while we play in the sandbox shoveling sand around. It's not difficult to "outplay" a side that doesn't even know there is a war.
I mean they are so weak, that their entire play relies on the craft of illusion - to deceive, lie, create narratives, create perceptions, manipulate. The moment their illusions no longer work they are done.
> People are back into repeating the talking points of their jewish parties again.
Oh... that's sad. BUT people on the right are increasingly fervent. For example Asmongold has openly named the left "evil" and asked people to report radical leftists to HR departments. It clearly shifted people more to the extremes.
Fuentes also got more popularity. Various right-wing commentators also became more radical. The topic of israel comes more and more into focus. People in comment sections are noticing way more than before, even in places where there was none before.
I think the entire assassination backfired. We are facing levels of nigger, faggot, leftist, israel fatigue that are... almost unprecedented (Weimar times).
They might have thought the assassination serves as a distraction, but it doesn't go as planned.