"OMG they killed Kirk!".
Me: "what is the right gonna do about it?".
"Prayer vigils!".
Me: "what about some sort of protest?".
"No we don't protest when they kill us, that's what the left does, that's wrong."
Summary: If the Boston Tea Party happened today right wingers would be bending over backwards to condemn the protest as "something the left does, not us."
Didn’t answer. “Whatever you want” is not an answer.
>you ignored one of them
Replied to both.
>"Anything I don't like is strawman.”
Nice strawman. Even had the quotes.
>God promises otherwise
Where is He, shlomo?
>No, you just ignore the arguments
“Whatever you want” is not an argument.
>you're wrong and don't want to admit it.
lol, the list I posted already proved you wrong.
>You're still not doing anything.
Proof you don’t read what others write.
1. Explain what **legal** solutions have not been tried which would lead to a restoration of white ethnostates, traditionalist society, and pre-Fed economy.
2. Explain what **less than legal** solutions have not been tried which would lead to a restoration of white ethnostates, traditionalist society, and pre-Fed economy.
3. Explain what **illegal** but still non-violent solutions have not been tried which would lead to a restoration of white ethnostates, traditionalist society, and pre-Fed economy.
You won’t do it.
No, I provided two rather comprehensive options. You ignored one and didn't like the other, as I said you would.
>Replied to both.
See above, which you're also contradicting your self again.
>Nice strawman. Even had the quotes.
"Anything I don't like is strawman"
>Where is He, shlomo?
Everywhere, inside you and me.
>“Whatever you want” is not an argument.
Okay, jew.
>lol, the list I posted already proved you wrong.
Facts prove otherwise.
>Proof you don’t read what others write.
1. There are no legal or otherwise "political" solutions. You'll never find justice where jews make all the rules.
2. See my two options above.
3. Why would I want non-violent solutions?
>You won’t do it.
Oh look, I did it.