"No we don't protest when they kill us, that's what the left does, that's wrong."
Summary: If the Boston Tea Party happened today right wingers would be bending over backwards to condemn the protest as "something the left does, not us."
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
Cazarosta on scored.co
10 hours ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
>I actually have it on record where he says exactly this:
You're still misinterpreting what he means. Read between the lines.
>There have been multiple times in history where Whites were extremely disadvantaged and still overthrew and won
Sure, but that doesn't change the fact that within the last 80 years no one has done anything of note in that regard. I do, however, agree with you that we can still win. Tallest does too, but on the predicament that we have ten years tops; not sure how he came to that number but take with that information what you will.
>These are contradictory statements.
Let's use an analogy, maybe that will help. Think of it like building a house. Spreading awareness is like drawing up the blueprints and getting all the permits - it's essential work, akin to what you are advocating for. But his statement is that until you actually start building the walls and putting on the roof (the 'shooty shooty' part), you'll never actually have a house. He's not telling you to stop drawing blueprints; he's saying that until you start building, you won't get a house, and all your permit work is for nothing.
>Again, you're contradicting your self here. You said earlier he doesn't encourage talking non-jew shooters to kill themselves, yet right here you confirm it.
There's no contradiction. In the first conversation, I was defending his stance against the claim that he was telling people to stop spreading awareness. I was explaining that he believes awareness is just not enough.
In my most recent statement, I was summarizing his full philosophy, which is much more extreme. I am not saying he said, 'go kill yourself.' I am saying his bottom-line ideology leads to the conclusion that if you are not actively fighting the enemy, you are useless to the cause and that the logical conclusion is that you should kill yourself - rather that it should be akin to that since we'll all be genocided in the end if we do nothing. I'm not confirming his words, I'm confirming my interpretation of his ideology.
>shut down all meaningful conversation around it
But he's not "shutting it down". He posts facts and asks for a response. Yes, he is more blackpilled and doomer than everyone here and that's because he believes what he says.
>You're still misinterpreting what he means. Read between the lines.
I'm not though. I'll summarize this entire conversation with one reply here: "If he's not going to shoot jews himself, he shouldn't 'blackpill and doom' anyone until he does." I've personally seen what he's done with two of my friends. One of them you can see in this thread is completely out of his mind, and the other no longer contacts him and agrees with me, but wishes him the best.
You're still misinterpreting what he means. Read between the lines.
>There have been multiple times in history where Whites were extremely disadvantaged and still overthrew and won
Sure, but that doesn't change the fact that within the last 80 years no one has done anything of note in that regard. I do, however, agree with you that we can still win. Tallest does too, but on the predicament that we have ten years tops; not sure how he came to that number but take with that information what you will.
>These are contradictory statements.
Let's use an analogy, maybe that will help. Think of it like building a house. Spreading awareness is like drawing up the blueprints and getting all the permits - it's essential work, akin to what you are advocating for. But his statement is that until you actually start building the walls and putting on the roof (the 'shooty shooty' part), you'll never actually have a house. He's not telling you to stop drawing blueprints; he's saying that until you start building, you won't get a house, and all your permit work is for nothing.
>Again, you're contradicting your self here. You said earlier he doesn't encourage talking non-jew shooters to kill themselves, yet right here you confirm it.
There's no contradiction. In the first conversation, I was defending his stance against the claim that he was telling people to stop spreading awareness. I was explaining that he believes awareness is just not enough.
In my most recent statement, I was summarizing his full philosophy, which is much more extreme. I am not saying he said, 'go kill yourself.' I am saying his bottom-line ideology leads to the conclusion that if you are not actively fighting the enemy, you are useless to the cause and that the logical conclusion is that you should kill yourself - rather that it should be akin to that since we'll all be genocided in the end if we do nothing. I'm not confirming his words, I'm confirming my interpretation of his ideology.
>shut down all meaningful conversation around it
But he's not "shutting it down". He posts facts and asks for a response. Yes, he is more blackpilled and doomer than everyone here and that's because he believes what he says.
I'm not though. I'll summarize this entire conversation with one reply here: "If he's not going to shoot jews himself, he shouldn't 'blackpill and doom' anyone until he does." I've personally seen what he's done with two of my friends. One of them you can see in this thread is completely out of his mind, and the other no longer contacts him and agrees with me, but wishes him the best.