"No we don't protest when they kill us, that's what the left does, that's wrong."
Summary: If the Boston Tea Party happened today right wingers would be bending over backwards to condemn the protest as "something the left does, not us."
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
genesisSOC on scored.co
20 hours ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
>Neat; you can’t read. So I guess jew are already defeated and you won. Why, then, are they not defeated and you have lost?
Just because you say something doesn't make it true. What definition of "win" and lose" are we referring to, here? Are we all one brown race right now? Nope. Are the jews all dead yet? Nope. Will the jews ever all be dead? Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 doesn't imply that they will. So, by the fact that we're not all brown yet means we've won in the past at not being destroyed by the jew, and the fact that you and I are still free to speak about it means total jew death is to come (If it isn't that Jesus will be the one to complete it).
17 hours ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
>Then stop making wrong statements
Illiterate.
>So by your own "definition" then we haven't lost because we're not all dead.
Neat, so… it took you this long to comprehend one sentence? I don’t expect you to be able to defend your Qult claims (read: you will refuse to do so because you know you’re lying), but when will we win?
Depends on how we define "win." If victory is the Lord's, then we won't "win" until Jesus comes back. But that could be millions of years from now, or it could be before I finish typing this reply. If victory is defined by the jews being removed from power for the foreseeable future like we've always done in the past, then it'll be when that happens. We can also have "smaller victories" before then, such as increasing White population, or at the very least making the core White population that remains much better so that leads to that White population gaining more power. Or if we want to go even smaller than that, every single White child being born is a "victory," as well as every single time a White becomes a Noticer, and/or becomes a Christian. The victory in your head definition is mostly "when Whites gain whatever today's flavor of 'power' is and shoots some jews," so that will come in the smaller steps before it, however you also seem to believe total jew death is the only victory therefore you'll probably never have that given the implications of Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. No, this isn't me saying we *shouldn't* try to do that anyway, but it is me making these definitions very clear.
17 hours ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
>Depends on how we define "win.”
Nope, subhuman. Words have definitions. You don’t get to redesign them to suit your emotions.
>>If victory is defined by the jews being removed from power for the foreseeable future like we've always done in the past, then it'll be when that happens.
“Two more weeks just keep waiting trust the plan;” GOT IT. THANK YOU. PAID SHILL CONFIRMED.
>We can also have "smaller victories" before then, such as increasing White population, or at the very least making the core White population that remains much better so that leads to that White population gaining more power.
Crickets when I ask you how.
>Or if we want to go even smaller than that, every single White child being born is a "victory,”
Not in the face of a globally reducing population.
>The victory in your head definition
Nah, try again with something meaningful to an actual human.
Just because you say something doesn't make it true. What definition of "win" and lose" are we referring to, here? Are we all one brown race right now? Nope. Are the jews all dead yet? Nope. Will the jews ever all be dead? Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 doesn't imply that they will. So, by the fact that we're not all brown yet means we've won in the past at not being destroyed by the jew, and the fact that you and I are still free to speak about it means total jew death is to come (If it isn't that Jesus will be the one to complete it).
Thanks for asserting something no one questioned.
>What definition
The only one, dipshit. That’s what words mean.
Then stop making wrong statements. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>The only one, dipshit. That’s what words mean.
So by your own "definition" then we haven't lost because we're not all dead. Next?
Illiterate.
>So by your own "definition" then we haven't lost because we're not all dead.
Neat, so… it took you this long to comprehend one sentence? I don’t expect you to be able to defend your Qult claims (read: you will refuse to do so because you know you’re lying), but when will we win?
"Meta."
>but when will we win?
Depends on how we define "win." If victory is the Lord's, then we won't "win" until Jesus comes back. But that could be millions of years from now, or it could be before I finish typing this reply. If victory is defined by the jews being removed from power for the foreseeable future like we've always done in the past, then it'll be when that happens. We can also have "smaller victories" before then, such as increasing White population, or at the very least making the core White population that remains much better so that leads to that White population gaining more power. Or if we want to go even smaller than that, every single White child being born is a "victory," as well as every single time a White becomes a Noticer, and/or becomes a Christian. The victory in your head definition is mostly "when Whites gain whatever today's flavor of 'power' is and shoots some jews," so that will come in the smaller steps before it, however you also seem to believe total jew death is the only victory therefore you'll probably never have that given the implications of Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. No, this isn't me saying we *shouldn't* try to do that anyway, but it is me making these definitions very clear.
Nope, subhuman. Words have definitions. You don’t get to redesign them to suit your emotions.
>>If victory is defined by the jews being removed from power for the foreseeable future like we've always done in the past, then it'll be when that happens.
“Two more weeks just keep waiting trust the plan;” GOT IT. THANK YOU. PAID SHILL CONFIRMED.
>We can also have "smaller victories" before then, such as increasing White population, or at the very least making the core White population that remains much better so that leads to that White population gaining more power.
Crickets when I ask you how.
>Or if we want to go even smaller than that, every single White child being born is a "victory,”
Not in the face of a globally reducing population.
>The victory in your head definition
Nah, try again with something meaningful to an actual human.
>that will come in the smaller steps before it
Crickets when I ask you how.
>it is me making these definitions very clear.
lol, you did the opposite.