New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
This is not even comparable to the assassination attempt on Trump, where the guy fired multiple shots and missed. The person who killed Charlie knew what they were doing, aiming at the jugular artery, possibly a professional. The fact that they couldn't even find the person makes no sense. How long is it going to take for someone to escape the roof top and get away with it? Isn't US intelligence so good it can catch people doing crimes from different parts of country and even the world? If they don't catch the person it's because it WAS an inside job..
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
BlackPillBot on scored.co
3 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
No matter who made that shot, under those circumstances, and at that distance, it wasn’t easy like many want to keep suggesting.

https://youtu.be/I8jXisOSOns
ScallionPancake on scored.co
3 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
> https://youtu.be/I8jXisOSOns

What is that video supposed to prove? Do you know what shooting 1 MOA even means? I suggest you learn more about the subject matter if you're trying to argue over it.

For anyone that's curious, hitting a human sized target at 200 yards you need to be accurate within 10 MOA. Charlie Kirk was a large guy at 6' 5" tall. Making him even easier to hit than the average person.

Everyone in your video with the exception of the 8 year old that missed could've made the shot.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
3 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Yes, I do. I guess I could have been more specific. I’m saying that even people that shoot regularly with amazingly accurate, and expensive, even “Gucci” rifles still deviate more than what the average person thinks. The average person thinks most, if not all, guns are literal laser beam “hitscan”, and that anybody can just point and click like a mouse. I know “conservatives” who have even parroted the “why couldn’t he have just shot the gun out of his hand” HURR DURR. That’s all I’m saying. Also, in the vid, none of them had to deal with the a living moving target, and extreme stress associated with attempting to assassinate someone. They also had all the time in the world to get comfy, and create a perfect benchrest. Just look at what the guy does at 3:42 in the video. Keep in mind, that’s only 100 yards, and the troon was supposedly closer to 150-200yds out.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
3 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Sure, but charlie kirk wasn't moving. He was sitting down.

The shooter was just sitting on the rooftop for however long he needed. It's not like anyone was actively trying to stop him.

Also I'm pretty sure if you told people they're being recorded for a youtube video with a channel with 1,000,000 subscribers, they might be a little bit nervous as well.

All that being said, it's still 10 MOA to hit a human target at 200 yards, unless the guy is having a seizure and is half retarded, it isn't difficult for him to make the shot.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
3 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
“Sure, but charlie kirk wasn't moving. He was sitting down.”

He’s a living breathing target that can make, and even did make large movements at any given time like when he got up to grab the mic right before he was shot. All trump did was turn his head.

“The shooter was just sitting on the rooftop for however long he needed. It's not like anyone was actively trying to stop him.”

We don’t know that yet(very possible), and even then, some would/could argue being up there longer might make the shot more difficult due to overthinking, and adrenaline dumping.

“Also I'm pretty sure if you told people they're being recorded for a youtube video with a channel with 1,000,000 subscribers, they might be a little bit nervous as well.”

Based off of the above, I don’t think we’ll see eye to eye on this. That’s a crazy comparison and take in my eyes.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
3 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Citing YouTube newbies missing 1-MOA targets to argue a practiced assassin couldn’t manage a 10-MOA shot is apples to oranges. Entertainment clips aren’t evidence, and 10-MOA is far less demanding than 1-MOA.

Anyone with a weekend worth of training could've made the shot. If it was 600, 1000 yards, more? I'd fully agree. But 200 yards is nothing for a precision rifle.
Toast message