New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
This is not even comparable to the assassination attempt on Trump, where the guy fired multiple shots and missed. The person who killed Charlie knew what they were doing, aiming at the jugular artery, possibly a professional. The fact that they couldn't even find the person makes no sense. How long is it going to take for someone to escape the roof top and get away with it? Isn't US intelligence so good it can catch people doing crimes from different parts of country and even the world? If they don't catch the person it's because it WAS an inside job..
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
4 days ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 2 children
I arrived at the same conclusion earlier today.

Here's my reasoning. Consider the average university campus. I don't know what they look like in America, but if my culturally similar Western country serves as any indication, there should clearly be a lot of surveillance cameras around.

So, how does someone bring a rifle into a university campus, go to the upper floors or roof of one of its buildings, fire one shot, and escape, all without anyone seeing him or any surveillance camera footage revealing anything about the shooter?

It sounds to me like it's going to be another Epstein thing. 'Oh, the cameras just happened to not be working at the time, nothing suspicious there, at all, trust me goy.'
 
My other relevant thought on this. In some of my past comments I have expressed the suspicion that President Trump will be assassinated before the end of his term. My thoughts on this have developed somewhat since last commenting here.

Firstly, the most likely catalyst will be to do with his potentially seeking a third term, for instance, under the pretense that he was cheated out of a 2020 election victory and therefore should exceptionally be allowed to run in 2028, which, admittedly, does seem like fair reasoning if everyone could agree that it was the case. (Of course, the Democrats, disagreeing that it is the case, will not see it as fair reasoning, and this will be what, in my opinion, will send a new wave of attempted assassins after Trump.)

The second thought is that if this assassin actually gets away with it, it will be in hindsight be viewed as emboldening this new wave of assassins to go after Trump. Remember, Mangione is practically a hero to many on the American Left, and if this guy also disappears into thin air, attempting to assassinate Trump before the 2028 Presidential election doesn't seem so non-viable from a Leftist perspective. He will think to himself: 'I will become a martyr or hero like Mangione if I get caught, I might even avoid death, and I might even get away with it altogether because Kirk's shooter did, so why shouldn't I try?'

I also dismiss the idea that the shooter was just some Left-Wing crank, unless it was one with a military background before he became radicalized or something unexpected. It seems highly unlikely that the vast majority of trannies would be competent enough to do all of this, especially the one-hit kill and the successful escape parts of it.
PolandCanIntoSpace on scored.co
3 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
In 4 years trump is gonna basically be Biden. He's 79 already.
I agree though that if the assassin isn't caught, it will embolden others.


BlackPillBot on scored.co
3 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
“I also dismiss the idea that the shooter was just some Left-Wing crank, unless it was one with a military background before he became radicalized or something unexpected. It seems highly unlikely that the vast majority of trannies would be competent enough to do all of this, especially the one-hit kill and the successful escape parts of it.”

I concur fren.

https://youtu.be/I8jXisOSOns
Toast message