You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
5 days ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Labor IS a scarce resource. Anything finite has a scarcity. You have to incentivize labor to produce it. We incentivize with reward(money). Reward without labor means nothing gets made, making EVERY RESOURCE scarce.
Yes. It is. We live in a scarcity society. And it os exactly the definition of scarce that matters. We only have more food produced BECAUSE people labor to make it and produce it FOR MONEY. And we would NOT produce it, or anything without the incentive of reducing scarcity in our lives.
If we lived in a post scarcity society things would be different, but that's not possible until we conquer death, because life is the ultimate scarce resource and that's what we trade for other wcarcities. Time(labor) for goods.
So to be able to get food, you work to get money. And you use that money to buy food. The banker kikes make money scarce on purpose so that you will work. But since they have control over the banks, anyone that uses money is indirectly controlled by them.
This is why they fought Adolf Hitler in WW2, he broke away from the (((central banks))).
This is why they hate north korea and iran. They don't have jew (((central banks))). They cannot be controlled by bankers.
You arent listening or cant understand the basic concepts. Food REQUIRES EFFORT TO MAKE. ALL THINGS REQUIRE EFFORT AND RESOURCES TO MAKE. THEY ARE SCARCE. SCARCE MEANS NOT EASY TO FIND OR GET.
Money is an infinite manipulatable tool to enable exchange of various scarce resources such as land labor skill and product. To the elites it is a tool to keep people enslaved into producing BUT WITHOUT AN INCENTIVE FOR PRODUCTION THE REAL RESPURCES DONT GET MADE. THE NONSCARCITY OF MONEY DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE RESOURC3S IT BUYS ARENT. you can trade a cow for wheat, but both require LAND and EFFORT to make. His concepts are fine until he says FOOD ISNT SCARCE AND IF WE GAVE POOR PPL MONEY IT WOULD FIX HUNGER. The money doesnt CREATE food. It creates EFFORT. The effort to make the food accessible is what limiting money provides, and not just to the bankers.
Also his entire premise of money not being used is false. We have ALWAYS used transactional representation to trade goods between people and not just for merchants. The NEW CURRENT JEW SYSTEM is what he's talking about, but even mud people used stones and beads and shit as representative currency FOREVER.
If we got rid of money and gave everyone on earth an acre of arable land it would still require EFFORT to produce goods from said land. How much of that land goes to waste because people dont use it? How many people starve to death? How many people attack their productive neighbor instead of growing their own?
They have used the money system to trade an infinite resource for real asset. They have created a system of inequality to produce effort out of the masses while hoarding scarcity. But that doesnt change the NEED for that effort to produce those scarcities.
And to your point about Hitler- he didnt get rid of *money*. He got rid of *usury*. He still used banks and banking systems to INCENTIVIZE PRODUCTION OF SCARCE RESOURCES LIKE FOOD AND LABOR. He just used the gains to actually help his nation and people and not just himself.
Food is not scarce, we produce 75% more food than is required to food the entire world. Food is abundant.
> Anything finite has a scarcity
Air is finite, is air scarce on earth? No.
If we lived in a post scarcity society things would be different, but that's not possible until we conquer death, because life is the ultimate scarce resource and that's what we trade for other wcarcities. Time(labor) for goods.
Food is not scarce, money is artificially scarce.
So to be able to get food, you work to get money. And you use that money to buy food. The banker kikes make money scarce on purpose so that you will work. But since they have control over the banks, anyone that uses money is indirectly controlled by them.
This is why they fought Adolf Hitler in WW2, he broke away from the (((central banks))).
This is why they hate north korea and iran. They don't have jew (((central banks))). They cannot be controlled by bankers.
Money is an infinite manipulatable tool to enable exchange of various scarce resources such as land labor skill and product. To the elites it is a tool to keep people enslaved into producing BUT WITHOUT AN INCENTIVE FOR PRODUCTION THE REAL RESPURCES DONT GET MADE. THE NONSCARCITY OF MONEY DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE RESOURC3S IT BUYS ARENT. you can trade a cow for wheat, but both require LAND and EFFORT to make. His concepts are fine until he says FOOD ISNT SCARCE AND IF WE GAVE POOR PPL MONEY IT WOULD FIX HUNGER. The money doesnt CREATE food. It creates EFFORT. The effort to make the food accessible is what limiting money provides, and not just to the bankers.
Also his entire premise of money not being used is false. We have ALWAYS used transactional representation to trade goods between people and not just for merchants. The NEW CURRENT JEW SYSTEM is what he's talking about, but even mud people used stones and beads and shit as representative currency FOREVER.
If we got rid of money and gave everyone on earth an acre of arable land it would still require EFFORT to produce goods from said land. How much of that land goes to waste because people dont use it? How many people starve to death? How many people attack their productive neighbor instead of growing their own?
They have used the money system to trade an infinite resource for real asset. They have created a system of inequality to produce effort out of the masses while hoarding scarcity. But that doesnt change the NEED for that effort to produce those scarcities.