We don't even have to do anything but cut all funding/ties with pisrael and cancel all of those bribes we give the muslim countries to not be hostile to pisrael. The problem will sort it self out within a year. I suggest deporting all the kikes from the US to pisrael beforehand though.
8 days ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
It's smarter to take no risks and ally with the moslems and use them as cannon fodder in the war against the jw.
That way, their blood and treasure will preserve White blood and treasure AND their forces will be diminished when the jwish problem is finally solved.
Then we'll be in the best position to solve our moslem problem.
Aye, but be ready to fight both when they raise their swords against Christ.
On that subject, it is interesting that the jews basically took over the entire planet the moment the (((Modernist))) faction browbeat the pope into removing the prayer for their conversion.
Islam is a heresy, which makes it marginally better than the literal Synagogue of Satan. Muslims havent been the ones lecturing us on how "bad" the Crusades are and how we should feel guilty for them, its always been *jews* who got kicked out by the returning crusaders after they tried to enslave them with Usury.
8 days ago-5 points(+0/-0/-5Score on mirror)3 children
Yall act like if Muslims or Jews didn't exist we would live in some Utopia. Yet in the middle ages when Europe was 100% Christian, there were still countless wars between warring Christian countries and schism between different sects of Christianity. It's like the South Park episode where, in the future, everyone on Earth is an Atheist but instead of that creating a secular Utopia, there are warring factions of atheism, the United Atheist League feuds with the Allied Atheist Alliance etc. So hypothetically even if Earth was 100% Christian, humans would just find some other way to divide and murder eachother, as is our species wont.
8 days ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)1 child
We’ve had a J’ish problem in Europe all throughout the period you’re talking about, granted, they get moved around as they wear out their welcome repeatedly, but they are an ever present problem in one European nation or several others.
Yeah but the wars between France and England or the Holy Roman Empire or Spain and Portugal etc were not caused by Jews. I get that it's fun to scapegoat Jews as the cause of all of humanity's problems but be realistic, mankind has been killing eachother since the beginning of time. Even in countries that don't have Jews like ancient China or ancient Greece etc. Humans just love to "other" eachother because we are tribal people.
8 days ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
>when Europe was 100% Christian
Oh? You mean the period where Jews were kicked out of 109 countries? Also the period where pagan countries were constantly raiding and invading the remains of the Empire? And the south was being constantly bombarded by Muslim pirates?
Jews never made up more than 1-5% of the population of Europe and were politically insecure by papal decrees that stripped them of any ability to own property or have positions of authority or power. Sure, they were given the power (by the pope) to lend money because Christians have usury restrictions (as do Jews, but Jews make exemptions if lending to non-Jews), but it sounds like you're ascribing European wars between various lords and royal families by an extremely small population of people. Which by the way, if was true, then that's pretty impressive that such a disadvantaged and insecure people could sway the head of kings to manipulate wars.
The thing is, wars between European countries didn't do as much damage as wars between a non-White country (i.e turkey) and Byzantium (Greece), Hungary and Romania
The damage caused by shitskin conquerer is unimaginable, not just to the landscape but esp to the genetics
They didn't have the same notions of "white" back then as we do today. From an American perspective, we consider all of those European countries to be "similar" because they're all white. But to those countries, they couldn't be more separate. Look at how Balkans treat eachother today. Genetically similar from our PoV but they treat eachother like they're subhuman filth. The notion that their skin color was a unifying force to Europeans is a modern contrivance and an historically inaccurate one. Romans treated Germans and Britains like garbage the same as they treated the Jews and Carthaginians. If you go to Europe and try to talk about race in the sense of skin color, you'll get confusing looks. A Frenchman does not think they have anything in common with an Englishman. Similarly you'd consider Asians to be a monolith too but to them they couldn't be any different. Japanese treated Korean and Chinese like subhumans for example. There's no real racial monolithic trait that extends beyond borders to be honest. In Africa, they're "all black" yet there are still individual groups genociding other individual groups over their differences. Humans will find some fucking reason to slaughter eachother. Even in a world where we are all blond hair, blue eye, white skin. People will find some other new trait to stratify a hierarchy over, maybe nose shape, body hair amount, or some other thing.
As an example of how modern day racial theories differ from historical facts is that Ancient Persians for example were "white" by today's standards going by skin color, maybe slightly tanned but not any more than Greeks were given they are both in a similar region with similar sun exposure. Iran (modern day Persia) encompasses the Caucasus mountain range from which the term Caucasian is derived. And if you Google search Pashtun people who are from modern day Afghanistan, you'll see many of the have blond and red hair, blue and green eyes and their lineage is not European but from that Indo-Iranian area.