Title says all.
Christians, Muslims, and jews claim that pagan gods are "muh ebil satan".
But the abrahamic god that they worship literally tells the jews, his "chosen", that they are allowed to have slaves.
Christians and muslims both owned slaves too, infact, muslims still have slaves to this day.
The abrahamic god told his follwers to draw the blood of children, and permanently mutilate said children, in horrific circumcision rituals.
Who are the top three groups that do circumcision? jews, muslims, and Christians.
So, how do abrahamic religions have the audacity to claim that pagan gods are all "muh ebil debble"?
How do abrahamic religions have the audacity to call their god "pure good"?
Honestly?
If that is what God and his followers are like...
I would really hate to see what satan and his followers are like.
The first 5 books of the bible, the torah, are jewish though, no?
And the talmund was an oral tradition before getting written.
Larges swaths of the bible were written by kikes, for kikes. Only years later was anything added for the goyim, probably by sympathetic jews like saint paul.
If Christians aint judiasm lite, why do they chop baby dick?
No. They were written by Moses, who was White just like all of North Africa and the Middle East was at the time. Jews do not follow the "torah," they hate it. They follow the talmud. The "torah" contradicts the talmud in every way. All those prophesies and blessings the jews claim were given to them by God to make them "His chosen people?" They never fulfilled a single one of them. Whites have though, and are the only race to fulfill ANY of them, much less ALL of them. Jews just demonize it today by calling it "colonization."
>And the talmund was an oral tradition before getting written.
The talmud in 300 AD is the officiated central religion of the jews. Jews started existing around 1200 BC when esau race mixed with canaanites, creating the edomites, who are today's jews. The khazarians/ashkanzi joined the edomites around 700 AD and make up 90% of the jews today, but all 100% (edomite and khazarian/ashkenazi) are still jews and not Israelites or Hebrews. White Europeans and Americans today are the Israelites and Hebrews. All of our langauges, including Germanic and Latin, come from Hebrew.
>arges swaths of the bible were written by kikes, for kikes. Only years later was anything added for the goyim, probably by sympathetic jews like saint paul.
Not at all. It was written by Whites for Whites. Look at Obadiah 1:18-21, for example. God says Whites will judge and burn the jews. Malachi 1:2-4 - God says He loves Whites forever and hates jews forever, and Paul reminds us of this in Romans 9:13. Paul was an Israelite of Benjamin, so he was White, not jewish.
>If Christians aint judiasm lite, why do they chop baby dick?
Because it was a White practice, as God commanded it to be during that time, way before the jews took it. It doesn't make any sense to you and me today because our entire world got jewed, but back then it was a way to prevent race mixing with non-Whites. Having a circumcised dick was how you could tell someone was White or not. Women would've been far less eager to lay with a non-circumcised demon. Remember back in Genesis 6 and Enoch, we started race mixing with the fallen angel demons of satan which is what caused Noah's Flood. Anytime we start race mixing = God gets mad at how naturally degenerate we become with less of His White DNA = God has to intervene and save us. It's what happened at the Tower of Babel and why He destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. Look at the world today; just like Sodom and Gomorrah with degeneracy, from race mixing just as the jews know. Jesus removed the requirement for circumcision because after Exodus, some of the tribes including Judah, Dan, Levi and Zebulon left for Europe and America but before Jesus, who went on to become the Romans, Greeks, Celts, Norse ect. and regressed into paganism as was prophesied. They stopped the circumcision practice, and Jesus's entire point was to reunite us all together again against non-Whites especially jews. Which is why it no longer made sense to continue the practice, and why today mutilating dicks isn't sanctioned by God any more to prevent all the problems it causes. Jews continue to do it as part of their satanic deception and because satan loves sucking bleeding baby dicks.
The vast majority of your Christians do not agree with this worldview of yours because if you ask 2 christians the same question you get 2 different answers.
Most Christians think that jews are "the chosen brothers" or whatever.
My criticisms of Christianity would mostly be null and void if they all believed what you believe.
But they don't.
Also you are avoiding the slavery question.
Right, this is a result of Catholicism getting subverted by jewish jesuits to allow non-Whites including the jews into the Church around 1500s and fell to the jewish gates of hell. Orthodoxy fell even sooner. Martin Luther saved the Church by allowing "2 Christians" to come together with their own authority to continue following unchanged Holy Tradition by properly hating jews and all other non-Whites forever. He wasn't perfect, but without him the jewed "authority" positions in Catholicism/Orthodoxy (Pope, Patriarch) would have destroyed all of Christianity. Look into Christian Identity.
>Most Christians think that jews are "the chosen brothers" or whatever.
Yes, this started in 1860 when jews started calling themselves Israelites and Hebrews to avoid the negative connotations of the word "jew" meaning things like "penny pincher" and "extortionate money lender" and "Christian child killer." Shortly after that they made the scofield "bible" which was loaded with propaganda footnotes and translations that rewrote large amounts of text to make it look like jews were always the Israelites and Hebrews, and footnotes to brainwash all the boomers today into this mindset. It wasn't a thing before this or the 1500s. Look at Saint John Chrysostom, for example, who said "it's the duty of all Christians to hate the jews."
>My criticisms of Christianity would mostly be null and void if they all believed what you believe. But they don't.
It doesn't matter how many people are wrong, the Truth is still the Truth. A million people believing a wrong thing is still a wrong thing. When you seek the Truth, push all the way through the jew and discover actual reality and history, you find everything leads to monoethnic White Christianity. But don't take my word for it, see the Truth your self. Here's some sources to back up everything I say:\
https://i.ibb.co/x87q6VNL/5.png\
https://i.ibb.co/p6D072gF/6.png\
https://i.ibb.co/29rHFkz/7.png\
https://i.ibb.co/21gWSP0x/34324.jpg\
https://i.ibb.co/dwJ3wwqp/15.png\
https://www.amazon.com/Who-Esau-Edom-Charles-Weisman/dp/1929205007\
https://web.archive.org/\web/20100611004254/ https://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/\
https://www.associationcovenantpeople.org/the-behistun-inscription/\
https://www.amazon.com/Missing-Links-Discovered-Assyrian-Tablets/dp/0934666156\
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41715497\
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)
>Also you are avoiding the slavery question.
What slavery question? I didn't see you ask a slavery question. Jews own the entire atlantic slave trade so it's entirely jewish. At the height of American slavery, less than 0.35% of all total slave owners were jews, but more than 30% were black including the first American slave owner named Anthony Johnson, while jews own the most of all. Jews bought and brought the african slaves to America from fellow nigger slavers for a mirror and other trivial trinkets, with White Irish slaves on those same ships. There were a significant number of White slaves under jewish masters in America. In all of history, Whites are the only race to abolish slavery everywhere they go, including the Vikings. Dublin is one such example. The Confederates didn't fight for slavery, they fought to send the niggers back to Africa because they didn't trust having niggers on their farms or near their families. They didn't want niggers in America at all. The jewish Union fought to lower White wealth and power by liquidating niggers into "citizens" and turn them into infinity debt slaves, which as you can see the result is we end up having to pay for all their debt and welfare today.
But Christians tell me that Christian identity is larping.
So i am not sure what to believe.
The slavery question is that god told kikes they can have slaves. So how can god be pure good?
Who's larping? The ones who love and worship jews but claim to be Christian with no evidence or sources to back up their claims? Or the ones who hate and kill jews with infinite evidence, sources, and history to back up their claims? Do you believe what the jews say about your ancestors, or do you believe what your ancestors say about the jews? Even the ADL hates Christianity Identity: https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/christian-identity
>The slavery question is that god told kikes they can have slaves. So how can god be pure good?
Think of it like this: You just conquered some niggers who were sacrificing their children to baal and planning to genocide you. You don't have 6000 years of experience and history to see what they do in the future, you only have the last few thousand years of the world being created and this is the first experience of them interacting with you and your people. You now have to settle and build your nation from scratch and you hardly have anyone to do it with. Your people are exhausted, starving and have almost no resources left. Do you waste what little resources you have just to finish killing them all and then die yourselves, or do you listen to God when He tells you to temporarily enslave them so you can keep the White race alive? It was never a permanent venture, as you can see in 2 Samuel and 1 Kings where God commands White King David to mass genocide ALL the Palestinians (Philistines) and jews (Edomites), only he disobeyed by sparing the women and children out of natural White man's compassion (which is why we're cursed with jews still existing today and they use matriarchy) and then God punishes him heavily for it, even taking some of his own children.
There are no jews in the 1st 5 books of the Torah. Those are Israelites and their predecessors, who were in fact all Christians. Some of those Israelites were judaites - members of the tribe of Judah. No one even called themselves "judeans" (a designation for residents of the multiracial territory of Judea) until after the kingdom of Israel split in half and all the Israelites scattered across the western world with the aid of the Phoenicians. From the very beginning of the book of Genesis, the Christ is promised to Adam, and every godly person who came after him is Christian.
Modern jews aren't even descended from the Israelites; they're edomites and other tribes that were literally cursed by God from the beginning. They were forcibly "converted" to the Hebrew religion when they were forcibly resettled into Judea by their conquerors. Their actual religion is Satanism, mixed with a bunch of esoteric gnostic mysticism which they learned from the Babylonians. They've continued developing it for the past 2000 years (Kabbalah, the Zohar, etc) while attempting to disguise it as a precursor to Christianity. They ran the temple because it was powerful, prestigious, and profitable for them to do so.
There is zero overlap between Christian and jewish morality or theology. They are polar opposites.
Someone already responded to me with the "Whites are the real jews" arguement.
There is no reason to repeat it to me.
Also someone else in this thread told me that the torah is only for kikes and that goyim are exempt.
The fact that i am getting very different from people who all claim to be Christian is making me even more confused than when i made this thread.
God promised to Abraham a single descendant who would redeem the whole world from sin, reuniting humanity with God, that is the Christ. He added that this Christ would be of the tribe of Judah, a judaite. Modern jews claim to be both of the tribe of Judah (they are not) and to be collectively the Christ (far from it). They worship Satan and believe themselves to be superior to God. They reject God's promise of salvation and insist that they themselves will redeem and repair the world, and will "fix" God.
As for the Nation of Israel, the Bible makes it clear that they are those who believe and follow Christ. That means it's the only propositional nation possible (as opposed to the retarded American civic nationalism idea), because it's based on the supernatural grace of faith, and built by God via spiritual adoption. So when the Bible says that God's house is a home for all nations, it's literally talking about the races finding commonality and peace only through Christ.
You have to remember that you're on the internet, on a forum full of white identitarians who are grasping for justifications to preserve the white race against its assailants. Every heresy and schizo theory in the history of the world is going to pop up and get mashed together into incoherent babel.
Keep in mind that there were five different sects worshipping in the 2nd temple and only one of them, the pharasees, believed in an oral tradition. The same pharasees Christ kept arguing with and calling the sons of the father of lies.
Later, after the failed false messiah Simon Bar Khoba's revolt was crushed by Rome, pharasee leadership fled to Babylon and founded a whole new religion, judaism, by writing the talmud and zohar. So there are three religions that all claim in their scriptures to be the true continuation of the Old Testament religion with Christianity being the oldest and islam being the youngest. Clearly, only one can be correct.
Of course, in the past few decades you also have dispensationalist heretics who think two mutually contradictory things are both true.
The thing is that because Christians are so splintered, it appears that your beliefs in this comment are what the minority of Christians think.
I am criticizing christians for what the majority do/think.
Not what a tiny group of true and correct Christians do/think.
Most Christian's worship kikes and think they are chosen.
But I think what is currently practiced is more important than what was written 6 million years ago because actions speak louder than (self contradicting) words.
If Mohammed was hypothetically a hippie, I wouldn't give a shite. His followers are literal orcs.
But I concede that you are correct.