Title says all.
Christians, Muslims, and jews claim that pagan gods are "muh ebil satan".
But the abrahamic god that they worship literally tells the jews, his "chosen", that they are allowed to have slaves.
Christians and muslims both owned slaves too, infact, muslims still have slaves to this day.
The abrahamic god told his follwers to draw the blood of children, and permanently mutilate said children, in horrific circumcision rituals.
Who are the top three groups that do circumcision? jews, muslims, and Christians.
So, how do abrahamic religions have the audacity to claim that pagan gods are all "muh ebil debble"?
How do abrahamic religions have the audacity to call their god "pure good"?
Honestly?
If that is what God and his followers are like...
I would really hate to see what satan and his followers are like.
Christian practice is not actually circumcision. That's a judiazing, heretical practice that's condemned specifically in at least two places in the epistles and resurfaced onto the American scene in the late half of the 1800s.
Right. Millions of Christians who mutilated millions of children are just fake Christians.
Nect you will tell me that sand niggers who do terrorism are fake muslims.
Thanks for throwing in the towel, nigger.
what the fuck is your problem?
Still though.
Thats like saying jews are infiltrating in a secular manner because israel is technically "secular".
But his version of circumcision is a lot more extreme than what most people ended up adopting. Kellogg believed in unisex circumcision for both males and females, and his variant also included the effective sterilization of the subject. And this was all because he thought that orgasms would make men and women weak
America is majority Christian at the time being.
Technically they don't circumcise for religious purposes, but it is still mostly Christians doing the circumcision.
Israel is technically secular on paper, but in practice, everyone in power is a jew.
Arabs who commit crimes in Europe might not all be doing it in the name of Islam, but we shall blame their savage religion anyway.
Ergo, I am applying the same logic to Christians in america, even if they dont do blood Sacrifice and mutilation for religious reasons and they are no true scotsman Christians.
Look, scalenigger, the Bible literally says that Christians shouldn't circumcize. It's in the part that says we can eat bacon and cheeseburgers.
The islam book says muzzies shouldn't suicide.
But they suicide bomb anyway.
What is written<<<<<<<<<<<what is practiced
Likewise, there's nothing religious about American infant genital mutilation. John Kellogg popularized the practice by claiming circumcision prevents masturbation, something Victorians were very concerned with. I'm sure I don't need to tell you this was false. He didn't do this because scripture says to avoid sexual immorality, rather because the Victorians had a common superstition that masturbation drained vital energy. After that belief fell out of fashion, doctors kept the profitable ball rolling by claiming it was good for hygiene.
Bonus: biblical era circumcision was different and left the glans covered. They would cut the tiny loose dangling bit off the end or, if there wasn't enough loose material, just make a tiny cut into it without removing any material. Then some rabbis noticed that some judeans were stretching out their foreskins so they could blend in with the Greeks. This pissed the rabbis off, so they invented a new procedure that maximized skin removal and pain.
Hmmm. Not sure how to respond.
I suppose I have to concede you are right about circumcision but I still kinda blame the abrahamic religions for my defilement.