Consume Product

I'm done throwing pearls before swine.

Kellogg wasn't remotely close to a jew. He was just a schizo lunatic that got popular because he was actually revolutionary in some areas, but insane in others. His advocacy of circumcision evolved separately from judaism. People gave credence to his ideas because he was otherwise well trained and knowledgeable. For his part, he did legitimately believe in everything he said. He circumcised himself with no anesthesia

But his version of circumcision is a lot more extreme than what most people ended up adopting. Kellogg believed in unisex circumcision for both males and females, and his variant also included the effective sterilization of the subject. And this was all because he thought that orgasms would make men and women weak

America hasn't been a Christian nation since back before the Supreme Court publicly turned our collective backs on the Lord and the boomers and goyest generation went along with it without complaint. No, we were all born into a nation that worships mammon, degeneracy, and niggers while wearing the remains of our forefathers' republic like a skinsuit.

Likewise, there's nothing religious about American infant genital mutilation. John Kellogg popularized the practice by claiming circumcision prevents masturbation, something Victorians were very concerned with. I'm sure I don't need to tell you this was false. He didn't do this because scripture says to avoid sexual immorality, rather because the Victorians had a common superstition that masturbation drained vital energy. After that belief fell out of fashion, doctors kept the profitable ball rolling by claiming it was good for hygiene.

Bonus: biblical era circumcision was different and left the glans covered. They would cut the tiny loose dangling bit off the end or, if there wasn't enough loose material, just make a tiny cut into it without removing any material. Then some rabbis noticed that some judeans were stretching out their foreskins so they could blend in with the Greeks. This pissed the rabbis off, so they invented a new procedure that maximized skin removal and pain.

>Omni benevolemt

The problem with terms like "pure good" and "omni benevolent" are these terms are subjective.

Vegans, National Socialists, libertarians, conservatives and pedos all have vastly different concepts of pure good.

>Telling jews it's ok to have slaves. Promoting circumcision.

I'm not the best Christian to ask about this because, as a Red Letter Christian, I don't care too much about jwish Mosaic Laws of the Old Covenant as defined within the Torah.

The circumcision and slavery scripture you are referencing are jwish laws, not Christian laws. Christians weren't bound by the jwish Old Covenant laws because they were "laws for the jws" AND those laws were fulfilled and passed from the law when they were replace by the New Covenant when Jesus died upon the cross.

There are all kinds of stomach-turning shit in the jwish Mosaic laws: stuff about remorselessly beating your entire family to death for the crime of not being jwish enough (Deuteronomy 13:6-10) and mass murdering entire cities for the crime of not being jwish (Deuteronomy 13:13-17) to name two silly jwish nonsense examples.

That said, there are some teachings from Jesus Christ that many would consider politically incorrect, such as New Testament teachings that clearly state sodomites don't go to heaven (1 Corinthians 6:9-10) and anyone who persists in promoting sin should be publicly rebuked so severely that others will feel fear rather than pride in their sin (1 Timothy 5:20).

Personally, I have no issue with these Teachings. They may seem harsh to some but I think they are necessary tough-love measures to prevent harm and maintain a healthy culture.

 As a Red Letter Christian, I can't think of any major moral issues I'm wrestling with over the Life and Teachings of Jesus Christ.

If you have one, perhaps we can discuss it?

>The vast majority of your Christians do not agree with this worldview of yours because if you ask 2 christians the same question you get 2 different answers.

Right, this is a result of Catholicism getting subverted by jewish jesuits to allow non-Whites including the jews into the Church around 1500s and fell to the jewish gates of hell. Orthodoxy fell even sooner. Martin Luther saved the Church by allowing "2 Christians" to come together with their own authority to continue following unchanged Holy Tradition by properly hating jews and all other non-Whites forever. He wasn't perfect, but without him the jewed "authority" positions in Catholicism/Orthodoxy (Pope, Patriarch) would have destroyed all of Christianity. Look into Christian Identity.
>Most Christians think that jews are "the chosen brothers" or whatever.

Yes, this started in 1860 when jews started calling themselves Israelites and Hebrews to avoid the negative connotations of the word "jew" meaning things like "penny pincher" and "extortionate money lender" and "Christian child killer." Shortly after that they made the scofield "bible" which was loaded with propaganda footnotes and translations that rewrote large amounts of text to make it look like jews were always the Israelites and Hebrews, and footnotes to brainwash all the boomers today into this mindset. It wasn't a thing before this or the 1500s. Look at Saint John Chrysostom, for example, who said "it's the duty of all Christians to hate the jews."
>My criticisms of Christianity would mostly be null and void if they all believed what you believe. But they don't.

It doesn't matter how many people are wrong, the Truth is still the Truth. A million people believing a wrong thing is still a wrong thing. When you seek the Truth, push all the way through the jew and discover actual reality and history, you find everything leads to monoethnic White Christianity. But don't take my word for it, see the Truth your self. Here's some sources to back up everything I say:\
https://i.ibb.co/x87q6VNL/5.png\
https://i.ibb.co/p6D072gF/6.png\
https://i.ibb.co/29rHFkz/7.png\
https://i.ibb.co/21gWSP0x/34324.jpg\
https://i.ibb.co/dwJ3wwqp/15.png\
https://www.amazon.com/Who-Esau-Edom-Charles-Weisman/dp/1929205007\
https://web.archive.org/\web/20100611004254/ https://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/\
https://www.associationcovenantpeople.org/the-behistun-inscription/\
https://www.amazon.com/Missing-Links-Discovered-Assyrian-Tablets/dp/0934666156\
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41715497\
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)
>Also you are avoiding the slavery question.

What slavery question? I didn't see you ask a slavery question. Jews own the entire atlantic slave trade so it's entirely jewish. At the height of American slavery, less than 0.35% of all total slave owners were jews, but more than 30% were black including the first American slave owner named Anthony Johnson, while jews own the most of all. Jews bought and brought the african slaves to America from fellow nigger slavers for a mirror and other trivial trinkets, with White Irish slaves on those same ships. There were a significant number of White slaves under jewish masters in America. In all of history, Whites are the only race to abolish slavery everywhere they go, including the Vikings. Dublin is one such example. The Confederates didn't fight for slavery, they fought to send the niggers back to Africa because they didn't trust having niggers on their farms or near their families. They didn't want niggers in America at all. The jewish Union fought to lower White wealth and power by liquidating niggers into "citizens" and turn them into infinity debt slaves, which as you can see the result is we end up having to pay for all their debt and welfare today.

My point wasn't that whites are the true nation of Israel. That is not true. The whites are the descendants of Japheth, as far as I'm aware. My point was that the modern jews are not the people of God's promise.

God promised to Abraham a single descendant who would redeem the whole world from sin, reuniting humanity with God, that is the Christ. He added that this Christ would be of the tribe of Judah, a judaite. Modern jews claim to be both of the tribe of Judah (they are not) and to be collectively the Christ (far from it). They worship Satan and believe themselves to be superior to God. They reject God's promise of salvation and insist that they themselves will redeem and repair the world, and will "fix" God.

As for the Nation of Israel, the Bible makes it clear that they are those who believe and follow Christ. That means it's the only propositional nation possible (as opposed to the retarded American civic nationalism idea), because it's based on the supernatural grace of faith, and built by God via spiritual adoption. So when the Bible says that God's house is a home for all nations, it's literally talking about the races finding commonality and peace only through Christ.

You have to remember that you're on the internet, on a forum full of white identitarians who are grasping for justifications to preserve the white race against its assailants. Every heresy and schizo theory in the history of the world is going to pop up and get mashed together into incoherent babel.

You're criticizing thousands of years of tradition for a mistake that's popular with the boomers. They hold enough positions of power to make their opinions official policy, but the younger generations aren't such big fans of jews or the fake israel.

Said the nigger that infests our community.