New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
68
posted 4 days ago by LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co (+1 / -0 / +67Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
ReChristianize on scored.co
4 days ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 3 children
"it" will always happen again, as people who inherit good times become weak and create bad times. Trying to future-proof a government is a non-goal because it cannot be done. We can give our descendants good tools and good teachings, but they will inevitably stumble and fall in due time. It is our obligation to make right choices in our time, and for those who will immediately inherit the works of our times.

As for the example of sabotaging the best group, that is again a function of the people. If the class is full of White people, few would want to, and those few that do will understand that their loss of social standing outweighs any gain from sabotage. A room full of Asians will think cheating is normal and do the minimum learning necessary to cheat to win. A room full of chimps will chimp out and nothing will be learned.

A room mixed of Whites, Asians and chimps, will have all sorts of cheating going on when the chimps aren't hooting and dancing on the tables -- and the Whites will start to cheat and brawl because there is no homogenous base from which functional social standards can arise and be enforced.
devotech2 on scored.co
4 days ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
I am not so sure. The hard times we are facing now are very different than they were before. And are not necessarily caused by weak men but by powerful men who are unscrupulous. It wasn't a case of people becoming decadent, falling, and picking themselves back up later on. It was an outside entity crawling their way through chinks in the armor for hundreds of years. When jews started taking power and influencing culture in the early industrial age, those were some of the hardest times in western history. So they in fact flipped the trend on its head.

And these aforementioned unscrupulous people have always existed. For instance, the best example I can think of from before the industrial era were the normans. Who were effectively white jews in every sense.

But the rise of the bourgeoisie merchant and banker class with the industrial revolution, coinciding with the rise of the jews who usually were merchants, put them in an enormous position of power over the very people who technically led them. And this allows those jews to pay off the bad actors, who have already always existed, elevate them, and then eventually make everyone with power a shabbos.

With the rise of global interconnectivity, this caused them to spread that influence anywhere and everywhere. And it was done through the socioeconomic system of liberalism.

And this is where politics will necessarily come into play.

What people like hitler, mussolini, et al did to mend the aforementioned "chinks in the armor" was to create a system where the jewish owned subsystems carried absolutely no weight whatsoever and thus, effectively, could not corrupt society. At least not for a very long time.

Like it or not, we will never be rid of jews until Christ returns. Evil kikes will always be here because demons will keep their chosen people carrying on through everything. The best thing that we can do is to *not* implement a socioeconomic system that the jews find embarrassingly easy to manipulate and infiltrate, or one that they created themselves, and instead choose the only one that ever offered a solution to this issue. Keeping the jews out and implementing a generic neoliberal capitalistic "democracy' is like trying to avoid brain worms while having a diet that consists of raw pork for every meal. And if you think they can't fool society again, they will. They have done it repeatedly multiple times. They get found out, killed or expelled, and do it again. They've fooled better men than ourselves. The only thing different now is that they actually have power because of socioeconomic factors. It was politics that gave them the ability to have power and it will be politics that will take that ability out of their hands.
ReChristianize on scored.co
3 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Weakness starts in the heart, in the morals, and emanates outward into a man's dealings. So, men who have lots of money or influence, but no love, truth, or balls, remain weak. Worse, they spread their weakness by setting a bad example. jews are the canonical example of this, they get short term gains in one nation or another over and over ... and then suffer expulsion or pogrom. Because their strategies are heartless dishonest cowardly trash (Satanic), which invariably earn them the enmity of everyone they deal with.

You're spot-on with government systems. Democracy is the very definition of failure, and capitalism is not even a system of government, it's a small slice of one and must be subservient to the moral and spiritual needs of a people.

There is wisdom in many voices of counsel, but that is no reason to permit authority to the many. Far better to have Christian Fascism or Christian Constitutional Monarchy, either of those would serve us a hundred times better than a republic, or Lord forbid an actual democracy! They will still fail when the men operating them become weak, which they will in one generation or another, but they will be more resilient and better able to deal with the challenge.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
4 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Good post, and goo discussion frens.
kalerg_plan on scored.co
4 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Byzantine empire lasted a thousand years. One important rule facilitated it's longevity.
c8h2000 on scored.co
2 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
There were no such thing like "Byzantine empire".

It was fucking Eastern ROMAN EMPIRE,the state having continuous legitimacy from the times of Julius Ceasar and Roman Republic !

And its fall is thanks to Venetian doge (with probable jewish roots) and Germ-mani(a)c "Crusaders" of IV Crusade who attacked and butchered their Christian orthodox Brothers for personal profit.

"Holy Roman Empire" were unlawful Germ-mani(a)c pretenders to the legacy of the Rome appointed by popes.
Toast message