Women these days are wasting their reproductive years doing vapid work at glorified adult daycares. Would it be sensible to ban women from the workforce until, say, their third child?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
genesisSOC on scored.co
15 days ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
>But with the reality of the world, there is going to be some contingency of women who will for reasons of class, workforce deficit, or otherwise, need to work.
I'm not sure I can see this happening in any perfect ideal monoethnic White society that excludes jews and all other non-Whites forever, could you provide some specific examples?
Throughout history it has been typical for women, usually of lower class, to take up certain types of work. The modern jewish global economy has made it so we're all of that lower class that requires dual income just to scrape by. That doesn't mean that in a better world, free of international jewry, there would be no necessity for women to work.
Examples of historic jobs held by women include things like housekeeping, au pairs, nurses, midwives, and even service work such as laundry. I think these are totally reasonable in the circumstances where a woman may need to work.
>Examples of historic jobs held by women include things like housekeeping, au pairs, nurses, midwives, and even service work such as laundry. I think these are totally reasonable in the circumstances where a woman may need to work.
Why are any of these "official jobs?" Why isn't house keeping being done by all the children and wife and other women family of the house? Why do we need female nurses? There's plenty of other men who can do the job better. Midwifery isn't an official job, it's just common for a tribal society to do and have. Laundry is taken care of by the women and children of the house. So I'm not sure why any of these need "employment"
We're talking about the scale of society, not a household. There simply will be an excess of jobs like these, suited to the disposition of women. And a 45 year old mother of three adult children is preferable to infinity indians
Hmm, what exactly do you envision in this monoethnic White society? To me, I imagine each family in a local community is on a rather large compound of "off grid" based living in members of at least 30 or more. Just about every married couple has at least 5 kids, some up to 14 or more, and all of these kids are put to work on various tasks around the compound; boys to male tasks and girls to female tasks, molding them into their respective roles as men and women someday. The boys will learn all the masculine tasks from their fathers and other men in the compound: hunting, skinning, gutting, chopping wood, building fires, creating shelters, lifting and moving heavy stuff, building useful things, repairs, ect. while all the girls do the same with their mothers and women: teaching, cooking, knitting, laundry, gardening, ect.. So these 45 year old women of a rather low number of 3 adult children would still be working with the other children and women on the compound doing their natural tasks. It's hard for me to imagine any other scenario in this kind of world
To protect something like that, you are going to need seats of power and that's going to attract and concentrate large numbers of people. And large concentrations of people have different needs than independent homesteads.
The closest to what you're envisioning that I can see possible, protected by militias, would still require a locus of power
I'm not sure I can see this happening in any perfect ideal monoethnic White society that excludes jews and all other non-Whites forever, could you provide some specific examples?
Examples of historic jobs held by women include things like housekeeping, au pairs, nurses, midwives, and even service work such as laundry. I think these are totally reasonable in the circumstances where a woman may need to work.
Why are any of these "official jobs?" Why isn't house keeping being done by all the children and wife and other women family of the house? Why do we need female nurses? There's plenty of other men who can do the job better. Midwifery isn't an official job, it's just common for a tribal society to do and have. Laundry is taken care of by the women and children of the house. So I'm not sure why any of these need "employment"
The closest to what you're envisioning that I can see possible, protected by militias, would still require a locus of power