Women these days are wasting their reproductive years doing vapid work at glorified adult daycares. Would it be sensible to ban women from the workforce until, say, their third child?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
genesisSOC on scored.co
15 days ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Their "work" is teaching other children with the other midwives and assisting the local community. They really shouldn't be any "employment" nor should they really be around other men. Even widows and orphans in general should be taken care of by society naturally as per God's instructions. I mean sure, you could consider things like stringing green beans, knitting and spinning flax as "work" but these are just common household tasks every woman should be doing naturally. If you're defining "work" as in be some receptionist in our current jewed world, I don't think that's how society should be at all
I'm certainly not talking about some mindless pencil pushing job the likes of which we have in surplus today. But with the reality of the world, there is going to be some contingency of women who will for reasons of class, workforce deficit, or otherwise, need to work.
And sensible restrictions to preserve the reproductive years of young women, and maintain homemaking and growth of family, I believe are the most measured way to deal with that.
>But with the reality of the world, there is going to be some contingency of women who will for reasons of class, workforce deficit, or otherwise, need to work.
I'm not sure I can see this happening in any perfect ideal monoethnic White society that excludes jews and all other non-Whites forever, could you provide some specific examples?
Throughout history it has been typical for women, usually of lower class, to take up certain types of work. The modern jewish global economy has made it so we're all of that lower class that requires dual income just to scrape by. That doesn't mean that in a better world, free of international jewry, there would be no necessity for women to work.
Examples of historic jobs held by women include things like housekeeping, au pairs, nurses, midwives, and even service work such as laundry. I think these are totally reasonable in the circumstances where a woman may need to work.
>Examples of historic jobs held by women include things like housekeeping, au pairs, nurses, midwives, and even service work such as laundry. I think these are totally reasonable in the circumstances where a woman may need to work.
Why are any of these "official jobs?" Why isn't house keeping being done by all the children and wife and other women family of the house? Why do we need female nurses? There's plenty of other men who can do the job better. Midwifery isn't an official job, it's just common for a tribal society to do and have. Laundry is taken care of by the women and children of the house. So I'm not sure why any of these need "employment"
We're talking about the scale of society, not a household. There simply will be an excess of jobs like these, suited to the disposition of women. And a 45 year old mother of three adult children is preferable to infinity indians
And sensible restrictions to preserve the reproductive years of young women, and maintain homemaking and growth of family, I believe are the most measured way to deal with that.
I'm not sure I can see this happening in any perfect ideal monoethnic White society that excludes jews and all other non-Whites forever, could you provide some specific examples?
Examples of historic jobs held by women include things like housekeeping, au pairs, nurses, midwives, and even service work such as laundry. I think these are totally reasonable in the circumstances where a woman may need to work.
Why are any of these "official jobs?" Why isn't house keeping being done by all the children and wife and other women family of the house? Why do we need female nurses? There's plenty of other men who can do the job better. Midwifery isn't an official job, it's just common for a tribal society to do and have. Laundry is taken care of by the women and children of the house. So I'm not sure why any of these need "employment"