Women these days are wasting their reproductive years doing vapid work at glorified adult daycares. Would it be sensible to ban women from the workforce until, say, their third child?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
genesisSOC on scored.co
15 days ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
I don't think there's any justification for women being in any work position, even for menial and part time jobs. I think those would be better served by men still, perhaps those too young, or too old, or too infirm to do other work. Women really, really need to be with their many children, and we need to be living in close knit large tribal communities as well. Not 6 million random families that don't know each other all living on the street but far from the rest of their own families
15 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
I understand what you're saying, but what of the women with empty nests? Who have had and raised their children? Should they not be able to work and provide for their community?
15 days ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Their "work" is teaching other children with the other midwives and assisting the local community. They really shouldn't be any "employment" nor should they really be around other men. Even widows and orphans in general should be taken care of by society naturally as per God's instructions. I mean sure, you could consider things like stringing green beans, knitting and spinning flax as "work" but these are just common household tasks every woman should be doing naturally. If you're defining "work" as in be some receptionist in our current jewed world, I don't think that's how society should be at all
I'm certainly not talking about some mindless pencil pushing job the likes of which we have in surplus today. But with the reality of the world, there is going to be some contingency of women who will for reasons of class, workforce deficit, or otherwise, need to work.
And sensible restrictions to preserve the reproductive years of young women, and maintain homemaking and growth of family, I believe are the most measured way to deal with that.
>But with the reality of the world, there is going to be some contingency of women who will for reasons of class, workforce deficit, or otherwise, need to work.
I'm not sure I can see this happening in any perfect ideal monoethnic White society that excludes jews and all other non-Whites forever, could you provide some specific examples?
Throughout history it has been typical for women, usually of lower class, to take up certain types of work. The modern jewish global economy has made it so we're all of that lower class that requires dual income just to scrape by. That doesn't mean that in a better world, free of international jewry, there would be no necessity for women to work.
Examples of historic jobs held by women include things like housekeeping, au pairs, nurses, midwives, and even service work such as laundry. I think these are totally reasonable in the circumstances where a woman may need to work.
And sensible restrictions to preserve the reproductive years of young women, and maintain homemaking and growth of family, I believe are the most measured way to deal with that.
I'm not sure I can see this happening in any perfect ideal monoethnic White society that excludes jews and all other non-Whites forever, could you provide some specific examples?
Examples of historic jobs held by women include things like housekeeping, au pairs, nurses, midwives, and even service work such as laundry. I think these are totally reasonable in the circumstances where a woman may need to work.