New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Women these days are wasting their reproductive years doing vapid work at glorified adult daycares. Would it be sensible to ban women from the workforce until, say, their third child?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
15 days ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 2 children
Yeah, I just don't see the advantage of working alongside women.

They can't keep up with men, physically or emotionally. They disrupt the cohesion in an all male team (guys in trades know what I mean, all you White Collars have probably never seen such a thing). And they are a guaranteed bitch one out of every four weeks (imagine studying the correlation between HR complaints and "that time of the month"; I bet it drops 90% on the other weeks).

On top of all that, they don't even increase productivity per capta, they just add bodies and drive down wages.

What's the point?
genesisSOC on scored.co
15 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Exactly. And worse, they're not even happy at work and being "independent." Who's happier? A woman with several children that they spend all day with teaching, nurturing and watching grow every precious moment of their lives, or the single 40+ year old with no children on several medications including antidepressants as she binge watches drama TV at night after work eating ice cream and addicted to wine because jews told her this would make her happy?
fourleaved on scored.co
15 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Women don't need to work alongside men, and they certainly can't hold high, tough,, or skilled positions like leadership, hard labour, or anything STEM.

Some level of extra income for people who have started families can be a good thing. And I'm not interested in unfairly flattening wealth inequality, so just like in the majority of history, poorer families need working women.
Toast message