New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-2
genesisSOC on scored.co
19 days ago -2 points (+0 / -0 / -2Score on mirror ) 1 child
>His mission was to fulfill and end the legitimacy of the jwish laws of the Old Covenant and replace them with the New Covenant of Christianity.

This whole concept is still not quite correct. Judaism didn't start until around 300 AD with the writing of the talmud. That's "jewish law." Jews are not Israelites or Hebrews, you are. The "Old Covenant" is still active as Christianity is only for Whites, as God only made Whites. The "New Covenant" is not "any race can be Christian as long as they believe in Christ, any race can be grafted into Israel" because that implies you're completely fine with race mixing and importing infinity niggers and jews and other nons into your nations. That's just Sodom and Gomorrah culture, which is modern jewish antichrist ideology, such as "equality" and "diversity." That's what the jew told you and is entirely antichrist. The "New Covenant" was to end our old practices like circumcision and animal sacrifices while reminding the tribes of Dan, Levi and Zebulon who left for Europe after Exodus but before Jesus and became the Greeks/Romans/Celts/Norse ect. that they're still Israelites and Hebrews and thus valid for salvation even though Jesus only appeared to those who stayed in Israel. It has nothing to do with nons. Yes, Christ is antijew, because He was not jewish. He was White. The jews are the edomites (and now the ashkenazi/khazarians who joined them around 700 AD) that White King David killed all their males then subjugated their women and children into a subsection of Judea called Idumea, where they were slowly integrated into Israel's society and then used usury to grow in power and status to become most of (but not all) the pharisees and sadducees by Jesus's time. Which is why Jesus says in John 8:39-47 that Whites can be saved if they believe in Him, but jews cannot because jews are not the bloodline of Abraham but satan, incapable of nothing but lying and evil, forever. Then twice more in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 after they killed Him, with a final reminder in 18:23 how they use big pharma to deceive the entire world.
steele2 on scored.co
19 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
>Judaism didn't start until around 300 AD with the writing of the talmud.

No.

The talmud was passed down verbally from one generation to the next for a thousand years.

The talmud is the teachings of jdaism's most respected pedo rabbis on how to interpret the torah.

Jwish history, teachings and the talud existed long before the talmud was transcribed.
genesisSOC on scored.co
19 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Jews as a race started existing around 1200 BC when Esau created them by race mixing with Canaanites. With this argument, you could even claim that "jewish history and teachings" started the moment satan was created, and/or when he tricked Eve in Eden. But the "legitimacy" and "organized belief" of judaism didn't start until 300 AD. Christianity does not come from judaism, rather judaism is a perversion of Christianity. Jews are not Israelites or Hebrews, they are not the "people of the Old Testament," God never promised them anything except that Whites will judge and burn them (Obadiah 1:18-21) and that He loves Whites and hates jews forever (Malachi 1:2-4, which Paul reminds us in Romans 9:13). Yes, jews (not Israelites/Hebrews) were doing Baal and Moloch worship and practices before 300 AD. But it wasn't what you know today as "judaism" until 300 AD.
steele2 on scored.co
19 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
How old do you think mosaic law is?
genesisSOC on scored.co
19 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
It would've been around 2000 BC, as Moses, and all the ancient Egyptians, were White. Not jewish.
steele2 on scored.co
19 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>Yes, jews (not Israelites/Hebrews) were doing Baal and Moloch worship and practices before 300 AD. But it wasn't what you know today as "judaism" until 300 AD.

Your arguments are based on false assumptions.

Even the Old Testament indicates the 1000BC version of the jw and all of their strange "gods" was a very different creature than what we know today.

The origin of Jdaism and their talmudic teachings about how to interpret mosaic law does date back to 1200BC.
-1
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
18 days ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror ) 1 child
No, the oral tradition is something the pharasees just made up. None of the other 2nd temple sects believed in that garbage.
steele2 on scored.co
18 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Do you think mosaic law was also a hoax?

Do you think pharisees just made that up too?
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
18 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
What does the written law that all five 2nd temple sects believed in have to do with the fraudulent oral law that only one sect followed?
steele2 on scored.co
18 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The oral teachings is how early kikes interpreted mosaic law.

Toast message