Jews win because they stay quiet about how they really feel to the goyim.
Being rich and then going on whatever platform to say men can't become women and fuck niggers and the holocaust never happened just means you won't be rich for long.
A better strategy is to pretend to be a goy faggot like the rest and quietly donate a percentage of wealth to people who are able to say all those things with their real face and affect actual change.
We need rich people who know how to keep their heads down and who are able to gaslight even their own friends and family if they're interrogated about their beliefs.
Not someone who will sieg heil in public and then lose everything the next week.
If anyone tells you that's "cowardly", know that they're a fed trying to trick you into exposing yourself and simply say, "I don't know what you're talking about. It's the current year. I love jews. White people are evil. Stop trans genocide. People of color." etc. etc.
> There are no magic billionaires who will secretly turn the tide. There's no trusting the plan. The only things that are options are grassroots propaganda and violence. A protracted war with a highly politicized insurgency playing up the propaganda angle tenfold with foreigners and locals. Don't believe me? It's the only way the backs of more powerful interests have been broken since ww2. China, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq (the insurgency), Gaza (hamas is fucking destroying Israel in the information war), among others. And thats the only way we can ever win.
All that stuff helps, but it needs to be done in synthesis with intelligent elite 20%ers managing the revolution. Otherwise, it's not organized and easy to quash.
>All that stuff helps, but it needs to be done in synthesis with intelligent elite 20%ers managing the revolution. Otherwise, it's not organized and easy to quash.
Not necessarily. Plenty of people with military skill/talent have managed revolutions and civil wars very successfully while otherwise being utterly destitute. Mao is a good example (nevermind his "skill" as a statesmen, he was an exemplary general). People with administrative and disciplinary capabilities should run the show. Not just the wealthy but whoever shows the proper acumen to do so. The ability to move money has little to do with the understanding of military theory. Unless you mean 20%ers in terms of intelligence rather than wealth, in which case I completely agree.
A successful movement needs all gears to be working in tandem. It needs its charismatic fearless leaders, its intelligentsia, its mindless grugs who do whatever they're told, and its wealthy phantom supporters.
My message is ultimately to these wealthy phantom supporters to not take on a public position they're not prepared for. That it's detrimental to the cause if you out yourself and lose your ability to make the money we need to supply ourselves. And that anyone telling you otherwise is feeding you false information out of idiocy or malice.