ZOG overload
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
China doesn’t need to match the U.S. military to achieve its goals. They only need enough to defend their borders. Their real strength is economic, and that’s where they’re winning. China is a powerhouse built on trade, technology, and industry, not on military might, and they’ll likely stay that way because it’s the logical choice.
Our government has profited immensely off the military. Keep in mind our government is ZOGed so you have to understand the interests of the government doesn't align with your own.
You need military for economic power. You need to be able to keep shipping lines open and potentially blockade others.
China has grown their military immensely and there is much speculation that they are significantly hiding their actual investment into military. China actually has a civil policy where civilian manufacturing plants for example must be built to military specs just in case there's a total war and China needs to shift their production output to military in the short-medium term. China is very conscientious about military might as they should be. They just want to stay under the radar as long as possible to avoid any preemptive assaults.
By the way, the threat to Ireland was likely economic also not militarily and I was suggesting China would use economic pressure to get outcomes they want also (they likely already have done so on numerous occasions).
Flat out incorrect. Wrong.
China is more of a paper dragon than people realize, but you don't have to exaggerate to the point of lying.
We only have estimates because China does not release their numbers. You are using figures provided by a globalist think tank. Were you aware?
Second do you understand the distribution of these forces inside that estimate? Do you understand how they do and do not overlap with other more traditional measures of actual military size?
> but you don't have to exaggerate to the point of lying.
You've believed a lie for a very long time. Now the game is to see if you're going to be incredibly defensive about it or if you'll genuinely consider the points raised above.
A point you might consider here is how does China's army react when confronted by the Indian army? This should be revealing. Why isn't it more widely reported?
Hard factual proof:
https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-comparison-detail.php?country1=india&country2=china
https://armedforces.eu/compare/country_India_vs_China
https://www.theautotechnical.com/2025/06/india-vs-china-military-comparison.html
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/india-vs-china-defence-gap-widens-as-beijings-245-billion-military-budget-nears-half-of-indias-national-outlay/articleshow/118752902.cms?from=mdr
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-vs-china-explaining-military-strength-beyond-numbers-4888129
etc. etc.
Prove the data wrong or shut the fuck up.
Are you afraid? Do you want to change your foreign policy because of this?
Pull your head out of your ass.