You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
9
devotech2 on scored.co
1 month ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)2 children
Well, China is corporatist, not gay and retarded, and isn't replacing its own people with retarded 3rd worlders. Of course China is going to be the dominant superpower soon. It's not even a question of "if", it's when
1 month ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Barely. It'd just be biding time. China's military is building exponentially whereas America's is in a seemingly permanent limbo, China is reducing its poverty rate whereas its getting worse in America, China is an extremely homogenous country with similar views whereas America is at the brink of a race war and a class war simultaneously, China has a superior economic model, China actually has a legitimate intelligentsia instead of a bunch of jews
In an odd twist, China accidentally realized mussolini's goal for Italy 100 years ago. Can't call it national socialism per se, but *fascism*... there's a case to be made.
1 month ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
China is not a militaristic country. They have a decent military which is par for the course of a country that size. but they're not trying to build their empire off of military might. They make military hardware and then turn around and sell it to anyone who wants to buy it.
Their main focus is economic growth and trade. The fearmongering about the Chinese military, as if there is going to be some massive stand off between them and the US is just fake and gay. It's driven by lying US defense contractors and goyslop eating zogbots who don't understand anything but war and marvel movies.
I'm aware that the propaganda about the Chinese military is fake and gay, and that china's strategy has always been "do nothing and win", however they are building exponentially to have a military par for the size of its population (as you said of course). In a country of over 1 billion people, that's an enormous and very capable military, this will be something that will assuredly extend beyond Xi Jinping's life, but the question is will the chairmen after him have the same foreign policy goals? Or will they start actively challenging US interests by deploying troops abroad during America's gay proxy wars like Mao did (which, the fact that the chinese arguably won in both vietnam and korea is impressive for being effectively a 3rd world country at the time), after they have built up that military capable of doing it? I don't think doing so would be a bad thing at all, in any case.
They are very few in number, concentrated in one city alone, most often end up leaving China to go back, it goes both ways with chinese workers in africa, and they are all part of china's larger strategy of soft imperialism to have the most sway over the African continent (which is working). It's not remotely comparable to what the west is doing. Permanent residence in China is nearly impossible for anyone who isn't chinese with relatives living in China (even then, still notoriously difficult), has actually gotten harder to accomplish, and being an illegal runs the risk of having a government that will actually hunt you down and probably execute you, which the Chinese have done with the Africans who overstayed their welcome before. Chinese labor permits also do not extend past 5 years, thats the maximum time that you can stay in china. If by some grace of God you do get chinese citizenship as a foreigner, especially as a nigger, you will never be considered by the public or the government as a chinese person and you will be ostracized from every part of society.
This is how contracted foreign labor used to work in the west for centuries by the way. Ironically, one of the most notable examples was the employment of Chinese laborers in the 1800s, who largely never gained citizenship in America and went back to China.
The growth rates of other asians in China is mostly among its own native minority population, which ebbs and flows with the Han population, it's barely worthy of mention. They're still chinese, it's like looking at the difference between german Americans and English Americans. I acknowledge that the Han are superior in some ways, but they're not exactly different enough to cause an uproar, nor will the minority population of china ever replace the Han.
In an odd twist, China accidentally realized mussolini's goal for Italy 100 years ago. Can't call it national socialism per se, but *fascism*... there's a case to be made.
Their main focus is economic growth and trade. The fearmongering about the Chinese military, as if there is going to be some massive stand off between them and the US is just fake and gay. It's driven by lying US defense contractors and goyslop eating zogbots who don't understand anything but war and marvel movies.
This is how contracted foreign labor used to work in the west for centuries by the way. Ironically, one of the most notable examples was the employment of Chinese laborers in the 1800s, who largely never gained citizenship in America and went back to China.
The growth rates of other asians in China is mostly among its own native minority population, which ebbs and flows with the Han population, it's barely worthy of mention. They're still chinese, it's like looking at the difference between german Americans and English Americans. I acknowledge that the Han are superior in some ways, but they're not exactly different enough to cause an uproar, nor will the minority population of china ever replace the Han.