New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
64
ZOG overload (media.scored.co)
posted 1 month ago by GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +64Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
20
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 month ago 20 points (+0 / -0 / +20Score on mirror ) 3 children
This is the type of stuff that will destroy the US and ensure China is the world power moving forward.

One of the biggest selling points of BRICS is not having to be bullied by the US economically. None of this is America first. Trump is a traitor.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 month ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 2 children
Well, China is corporatist, not gay and retarded, and isn't replacing its own people with retarded 3rd worlders. Of course China is going to be the dominant superpower soon. It's not even a question of "if", it's when
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 month ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
The US still had a chance if they weren't speed running getting everyone to abandon the petrodollar.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 month ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Barely. It'd just be biding time. China's military is building exponentially whereas America's is in a seemingly permanent limbo, China is reducing its poverty rate whereas its getting worse in America, China is an extremely homogenous country with similar views whereas America is at the brink of a race war and a class war simultaneously, China has a superior economic model, China actually has a legitimate intelligentsia instead of a bunch of jews

In an odd twist, China accidentally realized mussolini's goal for Italy 100 years ago. Can't call it national socialism per se, but *fascism*... there's a case to be made.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 month ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
China is not a militaristic country. They have a decent military which is par for the course of a country that size. but they're not trying to build their empire off of military might. They make military hardware and then turn around and sell it to anyone who wants to buy it.

Their main focus is economic growth and trade. The fearmongering about the Chinese military, as if there is going to be some massive stand off between them and the US is just fake and gay. It's driven by lying US defense contractors and goyslop eating zogbots who don't understand anything but war and marvel movies.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I'm aware that the propaganda about the Chinese military is fake and gay, and that china's strategy has always been "do nothing and win", however they are building exponentially to have a military par for the size of its population (as you said of course). In a country of over 1 billion people, that's an enormous and very capable military, this will be something that will assuredly extend beyond Xi Jinping's life, but the question is will the chairmen after him have the same foreign policy goals? Or will they start actively challenging US interests by deploying troops abroad during America's gay proxy wars like Mao did (which, the fact that the chinese arguably won in both vietnam and korea is impressive for being effectively a 3rd world country at the time), after they have built up that military capable of doing it? I don't think doing so would be a bad thing at all, in any case.
Niemo on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yes they are. China is starting to fill up with cheap African and other Asian imports for labor.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
They are very few in number, concentrated in one city alone, most often end up leaving China to go back, it goes both ways with chinese workers in africa, and they are all part of china's larger strategy of soft imperialism to have the most sway over the African continent (which is working). It's not remotely comparable to what the west is doing. Permanent residence in China is nearly impossible for anyone who isn't chinese with relatives living in China (even then, still notoriously difficult), has actually gotten harder to accomplish, and being an illegal runs the risk of having a government that will actually hunt you down and probably execute you, which the Chinese have done with the Africans who overstayed their welcome before. Chinese labor permits also do not extend past 5 years, thats the maximum time that you can stay in china. If by some grace of God you do get chinese citizenship as a foreigner, especially as a nigger, you will never be considered by the public or the government as a chinese person and you will be ostracized from every part of society.

This is how contracted foreign labor used to work in the west for centuries by the way. Ironically, one of the most notable examples was the employment of Chinese laborers in the 1800s, who largely never gained citizenship in America and went back to China.

The growth rates of other asians in China is mostly among its own native minority population, which ebbs and flows with the Han population, it's barely worthy of mention. They're still chinese, it's like looking at the difference between german Americans and English Americans. I acknowledge that the Han are superior in some ways, but they're not exactly different enough to cause an uproar, nor will the minority population of china ever replace the Han.
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
China will turn around and do the exact same thing as the USA if in a position to when it suits their interests. Anyone who thinks otherwise is fooling themselves.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Why would China need a massive military? What has ours really done for us? In the past 50 years, has it brought any real return on investment or just drained trillions with little to show for it?

China doesn’t need to match the U.S. military to achieve its goals. They only need enough to defend their borders. Their real strength is economic, and that’s where they’re winning. China is a powerhouse built on trade, technology, and industry, not on military might, and they’ll likely stay that way because it’s the logical choice.
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
China's military is massive. It's a matter of prudence. The threat of force is more times than not far more powerful than the use of force itself. Only a fool wouldn't invest in a military.

Our government has profited immensely off the military. Keep in mind our government is ZOGed so you have to understand the interests of the government doesn't align with your own.

You need military for economic power. You need to be able to keep shipping lines open and potentially blockade others.

China has grown their military immensely and there is much speculation that they are significantly hiding their actual investment into military. China actually has a civil policy where civilian manufacturing plants for example must be built to military specs just in case there's a total war and China needs to shift their production output to military in the short-medium term. China is very conscientious about military might as they should be. They just want to stay under the radar as long as possible to avoid any preemptive assaults.

By the way, the threat to Ireland was likely economic also not militarily and I was suggesting China would use economic pressure to get outcomes they want also (they likely already have done so on numerous occasions).
akira2501 on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
India's Army is larger. The people who are worried about China are swayed by US propaganda. You should step way back from that and take in the larger picture view.
HEXEN on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> India's Army is larger.

Flat out incorrect. Wrong.

China is more of a paper dragon than people realize, but you don't have to exaggerate to the point of lying.
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Recognizing the usefulness of a military is hardly needing to step back. If you don't think a military is useful then you need to step back.
BlueDrache on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
They have serious goods on Trump. He's a puppet.
Toast message