New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
81
posted 1 month ago by AGoyLessChosen on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +81Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
11
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
1 month ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror ) 2 children
Hitler was too liberal. A lot of Hitler's beliefs and policies would make a left-wing socialist blush with admiration.
Knight_Of_Saint_John on scored.co
1 month ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
I mean worker welfare, animal welfare, environmental welfare

All of his policies are net positives with literal zero downsides
10
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 month ago 10 points (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror )
welfare is good when you actually feel kinship and fellowship with the greater community. If most of the people in your town are strangers to you then why would you want to contribute to their welfare? There has to be racial relationship or a cultural and moral system that bonds them.

In America White people only know welfare as a bad thing because the government spends most of the budget on administration which overpays fat lazy black women to "administrate" a welfare office that hands out the benefits to mostly non-whites. This sort of welfare is terrible and actually sabotages and undermines the prosperity of Whites by paying non-Whites to invade White communities with free sustenance.

Then there is the argument whether or not charity programs should be government administrated, privately administrated or a combination of both.
NoDelousingThisTime on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Except he was a NATIONAL socialist, the lefties would screech and call him a racist. He stood for the German people, and secondary also for Europeans, and third, for the freedom of all people, even kikes. There is a gigantic difference between National socialism and all other kinds of kikes socialism.
Toast message