"The consensus amongst 20 year olds is that Hitler was too liberal."
(media.scored.co)
Hadrian was too liberal
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
21 comments:
Hitler was too liberal. A lot of Hitler's beliefs and policies would make a left-wing socialist blush with admiration.
I mean worker welfare, animal welfare, environmental welfare
All of his policies are net positives with literal zero downsides
All of his policies are net positives with literal zero downsides
welfare is good when you actually feel kinship and fellowship with the greater community. If most of the people in your town are strangers to you then why would you want to contribute to their welfare? There has to be racial relationship or a cultural and moral system that bonds them.
In America White people only know welfare as a bad thing because the government spends most of the budget on administration which overpays fat lazy black women to "administrate" a welfare office that hands out the benefits to mostly non-whites. This sort of welfare is terrible and actually sabotages and undermines the prosperity of Whites by paying non-Whites to invade White communities with free sustenance.
Then there is the argument whether or not charity programs should be government administrated, privately administrated or a combination of both.
In America White people only know welfare as a bad thing because the government spends most of the budget on administration which overpays fat lazy black women to "administrate" a welfare office that hands out the benefits to mostly non-whites. This sort of welfare is terrible and actually sabotages and undermines the prosperity of Whites by paying non-Whites to invade White communities with free sustenance.
Then there is the argument whether or not charity programs should be government administrated, privately administrated or a combination of both.
Except he was a NATIONAL socialist, the lefties would screech and call him a racist. He stood for the German people, and secondary also for Europeans, and third, for the freedom of all people, even kikes. There is a gigantic difference between National socialism and all other kinds of kikes socialism.
Why do White people have any obligation to non-Whites to give them equal rights or positions of power inside our nations?
To do that we have to pretend race doesn't exist. But pretending race doesn't exist is like pretending my home depot dust masks keeps me safe from the scary virus.
White people really have no obligation to even be nice to non-Whites. We should stick to our own people, show more grace to our White brothers and sisters, and be more distrustful and unwelcoming of non-Whites even to the point of hostility toward them. How do you imagine Whites will be treated when we are a minority in the USA? With embrace? FOOL!
To do that we have to pretend race doesn't exist. But pretending race doesn't exist is like pretending my home depot dust masks keeps me safe from the scary virus.
White people really have no obligation to even be nice to non-Whites. We should stick to our own people, show more grace to our White brothers and sisters, and be more distrustful and unwelcoming of non-Whites even to the point of hostility toward them. How do you imagine Whites will be treated when we are a minority in the USA? With embrace? FOOL!
nazi is short for the german word for "National Socialist". they were absolutely leftists, tons of socialist policies... just that they were nationalists instead of globalists. communism depends on globalist ideology because when things start to go to shit, you have to ban people from leaving, force them into labor.
Just a point of clarification, "Nazi" is not short for National Socialist. It's a derogatory slur modified from an old term for "yokel" or "ignorant peasant". It's the equivalent of "Demonrats" instead of "Democrats" or "Obummer" or "Drumpf".
And you actually believe what the jewish puppet says because it *didn’t* hurt your feelings this time, of course.
It's nice to hear positive feedback, but that merely encourages me to do more.
Is it possible that the White Nationalist movement grows so fast that the entire overton window can shift right even dragging some of these "liberals" into farther right positions?
the fake two party system exists to try to envelope as much electorate voter sentiment as possible. So, in order to keep a right-shifting electorate inside the envelope, now they have to have candace and tucker and more mainstream talking heads to start talking about zionism or the JQ.
It doesn't threaten jew power if jews still control the narrative. They are known for doing this. for example jews hijacked the anti-bank occupy wallstreet protest. so jews were narrating and controlling the opposition to jew banks. Controlling both sides. Or when Israel funds HAMAS and then uses HAMAS as justification to genocide all palestinians. Playing both sides to get the result they wanted all along.
the fake two party system exists to try to envelope as much electorate voter sentiment as possible. So, in order to keep a right-shifting electorate inside the envelope, now they have to have candace and tucker and more mainstream talking heads to start talking about zionism or the JQ.
It doesn't threaten jew power if jews still control the narrative. They are known for doing this. for example jews hijacked the anti-bank occupy wallstreet protest. so jews were narrating and controlling the opposition to jew banks. Controlling both sides. Or when Israel funds HAMAS and then uses HAMAS as justification to genocide all palestinians. Playing both sides to get the result they wanted all along.
Toast message
So yes, the natsocs were way too nice/liberal, and yet they get slandered as "rayciss" and "genocidal".