You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
RealWildRanter on scored.co
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
What happened to the disclaimer I gave saying Tucker is not a saint? It's still there.
> what's wrong with being gay in 2025?
The same thing as being a pederast 5K years ago. Faggotry is jewish. Fuck faggots.
> Lev 20:13 CPDV “If any man has slept with a male in place of sexual intercourse with a female, both have committed a nefarious act, they shall die a death. So let their blood be upon them.”
1 month ago-3 points(+0/-0/-3Score on mirror)2 children
Yeah, dude, I get that. But Tucker congratulated Dave Rubin and his "husband" when they "adopted" those kids. Why are those faggots okay but Nick (allegedly) being gay isn't? Can't you see the fucking angle here?
Tucker lobbies the accusation because guys like you would quote the Bible on something like that. Tucker is playing you and you don't even see it? Again, Dave Rubin is part of the Con Inc. "fraternity" and Nick is not. That makes it okay for Tucker to attack Nick with every possible lie. Pay the fuck attention, dude!
1 month ago-2 points(+0/-0/-2Score on mirror)1 child
# Rule #4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
You're clearly not up to the task, dude. Again, Tucker celebrates the faggots within Con Inc. but then weaponizes it against Nick. So some faggots are better than others? Which is it? The point is that Tucker is a hypocritic and a liar who will switch it up when he needs to or when given the order. That's the point. Again, no offense, but it doesn't seem like you can see the details.
> what's wrong with being gay in 2025?
The same thing as being a pederast 5K years ago. Faggotry is jewish. Fuck faggots.
> Lev 20:13 CPDV “If any man has slept with a male in place of sexual intercourse with a female, both have committed a nefarious act, they shall die a death. So let their blood be upon them.”
Tucker lobbies the accusation because guys like you would quote the Bible on something like that. Tucker is playing you and you don't even see it? Again, Dave Rubin is part of the Con Inc. "fraternity" and Nick is not. That makes it okay for Tucker to attack Nick with every possible lie. Pay the fuck attention, dude!
You're clearly not up to the task, dude. Again, Tucker celebrates the faggots within Con Inc. but then weaponizes it against Nick. So some faggots are better than others? Which is it? The point is that Tucker is a hypocritic and a liar who will switch it up when he needs to or when given the order. That's the point. Again, no offense, but it doesn't seem like you can see the details.
Now, why are you avoing my question?
> Mat 10:16 "Look, I’m sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as serpents and as harmless as doves."