You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-2
XBX_X on scored.co
1 month ago-2 points(+0/-0/-2Score on mirror)2 children
Then what's the issue? Why is Tucker attacking Nick with all this petty name-calling?
"Some gay kid in his mom's basement." First of all, what's wrong with being gay in 2025? I'd hold Tuckers feet to the fire on that one. Second, which is it: does Nick "live off a dozen trusts funds" or does he live in his mom's basement? Tucker keeps switching up the accusation. Also, Nick is almost 30 years-old, so NOT a "kid." But he calls him a kid to undermine his intelligence and credibility, because Tucker is a spook trained in that.
The reason Tucker attacks Nick is because he's NOT controlled, he's NOT part of any fraternity, NOT part of any controlled opposition. Tucker NEVER attacks Israhell, he just asks the question WITH THE INTENT of diffusing any concern:
> *"Oh, it's not that Israhell controls our foreign policy, it just happened to come out that way because Israhell is, in fact, our most cooperative ally in the region. Okay, well, nothing more to see here folks. It was all just a big misunderstanding perpetrated by weird gay kids like Nick Fuentes."*
Tucker is a Civil Relations Officer in the CIA. A propagandist. The guys job is to lead you away from the issue like a Judas Goat. You you will NEVER hear Tucker say that we need to kick out every jewish CEO, or that we need to purge jews from our government. You will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER hear him say that. Nick says it EVERY night. That's the difference!
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
What happened to the disclaimer I gave saying Tucker is not a saint? It's still there.
> what's wrong with being gay in 2025?
The same thing as being a pederast 5K years ago. Faggotry is jewish. Fuck faggots.
> Lev 20:13 CPDV “If any man has slept with a male in place of sexual intercourse with a female, both have committed a nefarious act, they shall die a death. So let their blood be upon them.”
1 month ago-3 points(+0/-0/-3Score on mirror)2 children
Yeah, dude, I get that. But Tucker congratulated Dave Rubin and his "husband" when they "adopted" those kids. Why are those faggots okay but Nick (allegedly) being gay isn't? Can't you see the fucking angle here?
Tucker lobbies the accusation because guys like you would quote the Bible on something like that. Tucker is playing you and you don't even see it? Again, Dave Rubin is part of the Con Inc. "fraternity" and Nick is not. That makes it okay for Tucker to attack Nick with every possible lie. Pay the fuck attention, dude!
1 month ago-2 points(+0/-0/-2Score on mirror)1 child
# Rule #4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
You're clearly not up to the task, dude. Again, Tucker celebrates the faggots within Con Inc. but then weaponizes it against Nick. So some faggots are better than others? Which is it? The point is that Tucker is a hypocritic and a liar who will switch it up when he needs to or when given the order. That's the point. Again, no offense, but it doesn't seem like you can see the details.
> First of all, what's wrong with being gay in 2025
It's sin. It's perversion. It's sign of mental illness, vice, trauma, abuse, demon possession, drug addiction.
White Nationalists not only condemn sodomy, we believe it should be illegal and arguably punishable by death. I say arguably because i suspect most homosexuals suffered trauma from being sexually abused when they were children. In most cases it is a cycle of abuse and unhealthy unnatural sexual experience.
We cannot have a healthy strong White Nation if we tolerate it.
I think i am. after review I think you meant that Nick should ask Tucker to elaborate on that to at least force Tucker Carlson into taking a stand against sodomy or define what his position is.
I don't think Republicans deserve Christian support so long as they allow gay marriage. Which is legal in all 50 fucking states. And yet abortion is still legal in most states. So Republicans get fake wins pretending they banned abortion, but all 50 states must abide by and recognize gay marriage.
Correct. Tucker wants to attack Nick by calling him gay? Then let's see Tucker go up against the full wrath of the QWERTY++ brigade on his own. Lets see Tucker confront baby-rape Ruben and his "husband" on their "lifestyle." Down with Trucker the Cuck! 🤣
"Some gay kid in his mom's basement." First of all, what's wrong with being gay in 2025? I'd hold Tuckers feet to the fire on that one. Second, which is it: does Nick "live off a dozen trusts funds" or does he live in his mom's basement? Tucker keeps switching up the accusation. Also, Nick is almost 30 years-old, so NOT a "kid." But he calls him a kid to undermine his intelligence and credibility, because Tucker is a spook trained in that.
The reason Tucker attacks Nick is because he's NOT controlled, he's NOT part of any fraternity, NOT part of any controlled opposition. Tucker NEVER attacks Israhell, he just asks the question WITH THE INTENT of diffusing any concern:
> *"Oh, it's not that Israhell controls our foreign policy, it just happened to come out that way because Israhell is, in fact, our most cooperative ally in the region. Okay, well, nothing more to see here folks. It was all just a big misunderstanding perpetrated by weird gay kids like Nick Fuentes."*
Tucker is a Civil Relations Officer in the CIA. A propagandist. The guys job is to lead you away from the issue like a Judas Goat. You you will NEVER hear Tucker say that we need to kick out every jewish CEO, or that we need to purge jews from our government. You will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER hear him say that. Nick says it EVERY night. That's the difference!
> what's wrong with being gay in 2025?
The same thing as being a pederast 5K years ago. Faggotry is jewish. Fuck faggots.
> Lev 20:13 CPDV “If any man has slept with a male in place of sexual intercourse with a female, both have committed a nefarious act, they shall die a death. So let their blood be upon them.”
Tucker lobbies the accusation because guys like you would quote the Bible on something like that. Tucker is playing you and you don't even see it? Again, Dave Rubin is part of the Con Inc. "fraternity" and Nick is not. That makes it okay for Tucker to attack Nick with every possible lie. Pay the fuck attention, dude!
You're clearly not up to the task, dude. Again, Tucker celebrates the faggots within Con Inc. but then weaponizes it against Nick. So some faggots are better than others? Which is it? The point is that Tucker is a hypocritic and a liar who will switch it up when he needs to or when given the order. That's the point. Again, no offense, but it doesn't seem like you can see the details.
Now, why are you avoing my question?
> Mat 10:16 "Look, I’m sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as serpents and as harmless as doves."
It's sin. It's perversion. It's sign of mental illness, vice, trauma, abuse, demon possession, drug addiction.
White Nationalists not only condemn sodomy, we believe it should be illegal and arguably punishable by death. I say arguably because i suspect most homosexuals suffered trauma from being sexually abused when they were children. In most cases it is a cycle of abuse and unhealthy unnatural sexual experience.
We cannot have a healthy strong White Nation if we tolerate it.
I don't think Republicans deserve Christian support so long as they allow gay marriage. Which is legal in all 50 fucking states. And yet abortion is still legal in most states. So Republicans get fake wins pretending they banned abortion, but all 50 states must abide by and recognize gay marriage.