New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I want to build a medieval war machine scaled down to be about 6 feet tall as a fun project, and I'm wondering if I should go with a trebuchet or a catapult design. I'm leaning toward catapult because I don't think trebuchets would scale down as well because the counterweight would be limited, but I think catapults are likely to be more complex in terms of proper building materials and maybe more dangerous if the shitty modern lumber fails under tension and explodes. Anyone here have any valuable insights?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
14 days ago 5 points (+1 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Trebuchet
 

Trebuchet at that scale wouldn't need some of the more complex parts like a winch unless you wanted to add it. You could build it and manually reset it at that weight and size. Also its a more elegant display of physics.
User1488 on scored.co
14 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yeah, I think you're probably right. I do think I would have a much easier time building a trebuchet and having it actually work versus a catapult. The forces at work are much easier to see and intuitively understand, if that's what you mean by an elegant display.
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
14 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Catapults are like a bow. Stress and potential energy. Trebuchet work with centripetal forces, gravity, and arc dynamics. Super neat.
Toast message