Consooming ALWAYS comes at a COST!!!!!
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Moral question aside, it's *significantly* less damaging than PMO use. Like, not even in the realm of comparison levels of difference. It'll make you sluggish if done in excess, but doesn't rot your brain, and doesn't feed into itself as a chemical addiction loop with escalating novelty.
Force your brain to get accustomed to it without the unhealthy goyslop version of the reward, and it eventually sticks as a prolonged health benefit. No different from improving your diet or regularly exercising.
Edit: If you must use external stimulus, using still imagery (preferably of a woman in a suggestive but not explicitly pornographic context) is also a night and day difference in terms of how much less bad that is for you than porn.
The more functionally close a sexual stimulus is to scrolling social media, the worse for you it is. This is why even using something like an erotic AI chatbot is also quite bad for you even though it's fully text based. Porn addiction circuitry runs on hyper novelty. Sexual stimulus that forces you to use your imagination keeps your mind limber even in release, while flooding it with instant dopamine junk food causes it to decay.
Again—think goyslop. Social media addiction. Sedentary lifestyles. Etc. Though porn is uniquely bad in how it fuses this with your animal sex drive. The addictive pull can be comparable to hard drugs, and makes you become insane rather than just physically unhealthy. That's how you get troons, of course. But I'm sure it also fuels things such as hardcore BDSM, cuckoldry, and other comparably pathological sexual mutations (though it is not always the root cause.)
While you're obviously correct about the nature of the modern woman (preaching to the choir, in fact,) nothing you've listed is an *excuse* to allow yourself to keep shooting up your brain with poison. That's the moral logic of a hedonist—and it's more at home on reddit than it is here.
But remain floundering at the bottom if it suits you.
Imagine you don't have access to red meat. Period. However, you do have access to beans, vegetables, rice, nuts, and dairy. You also have access to pure goyslop. Empty carbohydrates, seed oils, and refined sugar.
In a perfect world, your diet would be able to include red meat. But if it couldn't, would you eat nothing but pastries and top ramen? Or would you choose the significantly healthier option, even if it's not perfect? Would you say—"I can't eat steak, therefore I have no choice but to eat junk food"?
Your implication that men would be hurt by a *lack* of pornography use combined with the handshake is giving me shill vibes. We're *anti-porn* on this board, sir. Porn is jewish. Are you a proponent of spreading jewish sexual degeneracy? That's how we ended up with the woman problem in the first place.