Sorry for going a bit off-topic, but Glock had a male tranny on their official shooting team.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
10 comments:
6
9 months ago
6 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+6Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
8
9 months ago
8 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+8Score on mirror
)
2 children
did the glock malfunction and shoot it's dick off?
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
4
9 months ago
4 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+4Score on mirror
)
Bahahaha
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
9 months ago
1 point
(+0
/
-0
/
+1Score on mirror
)
No, but that begs the question, did it transition from sig to glock? All evidence points to yes.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
(((Ron cohen))))
It's hard to screw up a polymer frame striker fired pistol.
Pretty much everything over $300 MSRP will be a very reliable and long lasting handgun. It's looking like sig USA designed polymer framed handguns just don't work right though.
I wanted to like sigs so bad, but the p250 fiasco combined with seemingly thousands of different finishes they made available from the 2008 - 2016 era and still under the same CEO that destroyed Kimber's reputation put them in the bottom of the list. I'd jump on older p series, and the sig pro however.
Also that sig won recent contracts and immediately bought back thousands of M17s after delivery then resold them to civ market was strange. I looked at a few contest requirements for different contracts and it seems like someone had a spec sheet for the p320 and other sig firearms in front of them while they wrote up the requirements.
I can swear I once saw a specific paint color called out that was an exclusive color just for sigs, and nominal dimensional requirements matched exactly.
Pretty much everything over $300 MSRP will be a very reliable and long lasting handgun. It's looking like sig USA designed polymer framed handguns just don't work right though.
I wanted to like sigs so bad, but the p250 fiasco combined with seemingly thousands of different finishes they made available from the 2008 - 2016 era and still under the same CEO that destroyed Kimber's reputation put them in the bottom of the list. I'd jump on older p series, and the sig pro however.
Also that sig won recent contracts and immediately bought back thousands of M17s after delivery then resold them to civ market was strange. I looked at a few contest requirements for different contracts and it seems like someone had a spec sheet for the p320 and other sig firearms in front of them while they wrote up the requirements.
I can swear I once saw a specific paint color called out that was an exclusive color just for sigs, and nominal dimensional requirements matched exactly.
Shame with the company, i have some older models that are still excellent, but refuse to buy any of their new stuff.
As far as German made arms go, I tend to stick with Heckler & Koch. I've had my USP .40 for over 20 years, put between 25-30K rounds through it, and have had a total of 3 feed jams that were easily cleared. The MP5 & G3 are both magnificent weapons as well.
While I prefer the feel & stopping power of my SA 1911, no sidearm has come close to the USP reliability wise.
It is disappointing what Sig has become. In the late 90s-early 000s the name was unimpeachable; pretty much unanimously revered by shootists. The reputation free fall is a shame, but well deserved.
While I prefer the feel & stopping power of my SA 1911, no sidearm has come close to the USP reliability wise.
It is disappointing what Sig has become. In the late 90s-early 000s the name was unimpeachable; pretty much unanimously revered by shootists. The reputation free fall is a shame, but well deserved.
Toast message