New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
When Trump and Musk were butt buddies, I'd post antisemitic comments daily and my entire feed would be nothing but like 5 other antisemites with 0 reach. I'd post for months and still nothing. Ever since Musk and Trump had their blowout and the Epstein file fiasco happened, I've noticed my reach has gone up considerably and I'm getting much more engagement. Coincidence? I doubt it. The change is way too noticeable and timing impeccable.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
ValuesLiberty on scored.co
5 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Check out Ernst Jungers book, the Waldganger from 1951. One of his topics is how they look to see how you vote for something to target you...
NikolaiVsevolodovich on scored.co
5 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I think I remember reading about czechoslovakia in the 30s and how their dictator (omg there were other dictators in the region!) held elections with only his name on the ballot, so if you wanted to vote for someone else you had to write it in.

And of course they had guards there who could see everyone who wrote in their votes, and subsequently disappear them, or at the very least persecute them. Those people were naturally ethnic Germans trapped there.
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
5 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Yeah, these sorts of filtetration mechanisms have been around for a while. I believe some Chinese leader once invited all his rivals to some "conference" to discuss their grievances but he just killed them all instead. Red Wedding in Game of Thrones, etc...

Letting your enemies identify you when you aren't the majority and among only your people who would defend you is not a good thing. Our societies are highly compromised and our enemies walk among us.
Toast message