1 day ago19 points(+0/-0/+19Score on mirror)2 children
It definitely did something to warrant being kicked out, and now it's crying to the media **KNOWING** that MIT can't comment on internal disciplinary actions due to privacy laws. It's like attacking your doctor in public knowing they can't defend themselves without violating some HIPAA law.
It appears it left voluntarily but if MIT initiated the exile for cause (laws were broken) they always have the option of having the former student charged officially so they can speak about it after the trial.
No. No. Absolutely not. There's a whole *law* of unintended consequences that the left violate constantly and it bites them in the ass every fucking time.
1 day ago14 points(+0/-0/+14Score on mirror)1 child
It's 100% certain the kike did things that would deserve him hanging instead of just "chased out." Which probably is nothing but him kvetching about how 1 person noticed him being a jew, him throwing a fit, and then making a spectacle about it.
1 day ago14 points(+0/-0/+14Score on mirror)1 child
Absolutely. Since Jews are a protected class, no American university of any size would risk their reputation or accreditation to throw even one of them out unless they have certain proof that they did something completely indefensible.
The fact that this kike decided to take his case to the NYP opinion page instead of a court is proof that he doesn't have a single leg to stand on, because I guarantee you every Jewish lawyer on the East Coast would be gleefully rubbing their hands at the prospect of suing MIT over discrimination if there was but a shred of evidence.
thanks for the reminder that jew york yiddy is a cesspit of kikery that needs to be triple-nuked so we can pick up all the kikes of the world and throw them in a c-130 and drop them into the nuclear hell-o-caust crater afterwards.
1 day ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)1 child
just read through the lawsuit they filed last week https://brandeiscenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/06.25.2025-MIT-Complaint.pdf
it's nauseating and very heavily editorialized. most of it is allegations of other shit the university had nothing to do with, not even failure to stop people from doing stuff.
and then there's the big ethnonationalist question... he's not israeli but he is jewish. the target of the harassment was not jews in general, but israel.
* either israel is NOT a violent ethnonationalist state for jews, and thus he has no causal link to the harassment because he's not israeli... wasn't even about him. he has no standing.
* or israel is a violent ethnationalist state for jews, and it was about him, but then they're guilty of war crimes and ethnic cleansing, and protests are completely protected free speech. while MIT is technically private, they take billions of dollars in taxpayer funding and thus cannot restrict free speech any more than the government can.
sortof. the law facially permits that, but in practice, the evidentiary requirements are high enough that many american and european people who claim to be jewish do not qualify.
that also doesn't address the conundrum. either he has no standing because it's not even about him (because he's not israeli), or it's protected speech against ethnic cleansing.
1 day ago16 points(+0/-0/+16Score on mirror)1 child
TLDR: he wasn't chased out, he left because everyone opposes the genocide in gaza and his kvetching that opposing mass murder is antikiketism fell on deaf ears.
The "oppression" was goyim at the university being allowed to complain about Israel. He wants all goyim stripped of their right to free speech, something almost the entire GOP agrees with.
literal mud golem moment. In their own religious book it talks about specifically this, exactly this. and they keep doing it to themselves all the time.
Lol, lmao even
Another kike cheating the system as always.
negrotory, sire. we must scalpel the kike. pagan oaths don't mean shit anyways.
and what's wrong with sending a kike on his way
unless i'm misunderstanding your comment