10 months ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
>Take a handgun, point it at your temple, and pull the trigger. That will get you the proof you need.
Thanks for admitting you lied about your claims. You have conceded the argument.
>Absence of good faith results in having to obtain political goals by other means. Politics by other means is war. If you act in bad faith the solution to the argument is violence. This is the lifelong thesis of Carl von Clausewitz, so the proof of this components would be the sum and total of his life's works.
This is obvious to most of the population, so the most common solution is to just act in good faith.
Cool, and? If you had a point, you would have posted it instead.
>So what is the solution here, when you make the regular proof for your method of acting impossible?
The what.
>You have no argument. Just lies.
Thanks for admitting everything everyone has said about you is objectively true. You’ve conceded the argument.
10 months ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> My point is that you need to take a handgun, point it at your temple, and pull the trigger. That will get you the proof you need.
So you copy-pasted your comment with this nigger-level IQ claim.
How about you take a handgun, point it at your temple, and pull the trigger? Whatever it will prove, it would prove the opposite. And hey, it's -1 faggot zionist boomer whose bloodline is long soiled by niggers, so nothing of value would be lost!
10 months ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> so the most common solution is to just act in good faith
You mean to have our people, and ONLY our people toil and slave away on behalf of subhumans and niggers? Forever? Why do only *we* have to be the "good guys"?
The moment you stop handing infinite welfare to niggers, it's race war. They will come at you at full force, and going after Whites, especially civilians.
> and for you to provide that proof to yourself is to shoot yourself.
What you said is absolutely nonsensical btw. Completely deranged and idiotic. This is so unhinged, extracting any information from that comment alone is impossible. It doesn't advocate for any stance... it's at best an appeal to the status quo, if we are generously interpreting it.
10 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> Acting in good faith means just not lying to perpetually obstruct diplomatic breakdown of your ideology
Alright. I want ethnic homogeneity of only Whites with nobody yearning for niggers to get imported (ideologically). Simple, isn't it?
> If you act in bad faith the solution to the argument is violence.
A violent solution is inevitable, given that decades and centuries have been dedicated to make peaceful solutions impossible.
> Carl von Clausewitz
He didn't live in an era where ethnic intermixing was ever a concern, or could even be imagined. I do not advocate for war with other nations anyway, that's what he certainly meant. Or over political disputes of minor relevance. I am talking about extinction level situations.
> Sure. Why would I fear that?
Because there are plenty of people who don't want to "risk" it out of a sense of "being nice." The very threat of race wars averts people from ever developing the intent to stop being exploited, and the communist ideology further forces/normalizes the support for degeneracy and subhumans in our own countries in unbound amounts.
You don't have to fear it because there is no political force in our countries that seeks to do anything that could lead to a race war (end of our exploitation).
> it is just that you are afraid of my ideology
It's not an ideology. It's just boring nonsense.
> You are forcing political breakdown.
And you are siding with the status quo, which is utterly terrible. So you want us to continue to be exploited on behalf of non-Whites, right?
Well, you are not working, right? So you don't have to pay for your actions anyway. But your offspring do. And one of your children has tainted its bloodline with a nigger. Quite a toll on your dignity.
You spoke about ideology and truth. Doesn't make my position clear enough?
> No, you are a loser who is talking through the internet specifically to avoid that.
That's just a sloppy ad hominem attempt, not an argument. This is what ***needs*** to happen on a large-scale level involving millions of people. I am just 1 person.
> How does that tie into this discussion? (Clausewitz)
It ties in because Clausewitz never had to deal with modern agriculture resulting in low amount of people working in the food industry, niggers in general, a system of welfare (socialism) and mass imported niggers who get shoveled infinite welfare for doing nothing (communism v2.0).
And because he was concerned with different things, so dragging him into this is false. Which you did. And you insisted on the "shoot yourself" bullshit, so it's quite relevant, unless you take the hit and argue what you excessively spoke about was irrelevant.
So far you provided not a single argument btw.
> Outside of that, what you want would be war.
Is that so? A war with whom now?
> So you assumed my position without having any basis on anything I said
Am I wrong though? This little conversation happens because you desperately try to dodge and deflect. Your hostility towards me is *because* I am right about you, but you'd feel ashamed to admit it's true.
Remember, you provided nothing to disprove me, not even sweet lies.
> Your inability to address it in good faith does not make it nonsense.
Perhaps if my brain falls out and my IQ drops to yours, I could engage with it.
> what I want is a massive reform
Then tell me what you want. I told you my goals (which you weirdly called a non sequitur). Civic nationalism maybe? Or a good ol' cuckservative-zionist regime? Tell me. What do you want changed?
> No, I want you dead because you as an individual are a shit person.
Well, not really. I work, I am nice to people, I am helpful, I am a burden to nobody, and I drive carefully. People who know me like me. It's just your feckless boomer rage against those who hate your beloved niggers and jews.
I don't want you dead, but politically you should have 0% impact, along with your peers.
> This is nonsensical ramblings.
Well, isn't it true though? You have a nigger offspring, a grandchild who is forklift certified?
Thanks for admitting you lied about your claims. You have conceded the argument.
>Absence of good faith results in having to obtain political goals by other means. Politics by other means is war. If you act in bad faith the solution to the argument is violence. This is the lifelong thesis of Carl von Clausewitz, so the proof of this components would be the sum and total of his life's works.
This is obvious to most of the population, so the most common solution is to just act in good faith.
Cool, and? If you had a point, you would have posted it instead.
>So what is the solution here, when you make the regular proof for your method of acting impossible?
The what.
>You have no argument. Just lies.
Thanks for admitting everything everyone has said about you is objectively true. You’ve conceded the argument.
Sub-90 IQ confirmed.
> My point is
Thank you for admitting that you are incapable of proving anything you have said on any topic.
>[copypasta of non sequitur]
Didn’t work the first time; why would it work now?
[citation needed]
So you copy-pasted your comment with this nigger-level IQ claim.
How about you take a handgun, point it at your temple, and pull the trigger? Whatever it will prove, it would prove the opposite. And hey, it's -1 faggot zionist boomer whose bloodline is long soiled by niggers, so nothing of value would be lost!
You mean to have our people, and ONLY our people toil and slave away on behalf of subhumans and niggers? Forever? Why do only *we* have to be the "good guys"?
The moment you stop handing infinite welfare to niggers, it's race war. They will come at you at full force, and going after Whites, especially civilians.
> and for you to provide that proof to yourself is to shoot yourself.
What you said is absolutely nonsensical btw. Completely deranged and idiotic. This is so unhinged, extracting any information from that comment alone is impossible. It doesn't advocate for any stance... it's at best an appeal to the status quo, if we are generously interpreting it.
Alright. I want ethnic homogeneity of only Whites with nobody yearning for niggers to get imported (ideologically). Simple, isn't it?
> If you act in bad faith the solution to the argument is violence.
A violent solution is inevitable, given that decades and centuries have been dedicated to make peaceful solutions impossible.
> Carl von Clausewitz
He didn't live in an era where ethnic intermixing was ever a concern, or could even be imagined. I do not advocate for war with other nations anyway, that's what he certainly meant. Or over political disputes of minor relevance. I am talking about extinction level situations.
> Sure. Why would I fear that?
Because there are plenty of people who don't want to "risk" it out of a sense of "being nice." The very threat of race wars averts people from ever developing the intent to stop being exploited, and the communist ideology further forces/normalizes the support for degeneracy and subhumans in our own countries in unbound amounts.
You don't have to fear it because there is no political force in our countries that seeks to do anything that could lead to a race war (end of our exploitation).
> it is just that you are afraid of my ideology
It's not an ideology. It's just boring nonsense.
> You are forcing political breakdown.
And you are siding with the status quo, which is utterly terrible. So you want us to continue to be exploited on behalf of non-Whites, right?
Well, you are not working, right? So you don't have to pay for your actions anyway. But your offspring do. And one of your children has tainted its bloodline with a nigger. Quite a toll on your dignity.
You spoke about ideology and truth. Doesn't make my position clear enough?
> No, you are a loser who is talking through the internet specifically to avoid that.
That's just a sloppy ad hominem attempt, not an argument. This is what ***needs*** to happen on a large-scale level involving millions of people. I am just 1 person.
> How does that tie into this discussion? (Clausewitz)
It ties in because Clausewitz never had to deal with modern agriculture resulting in low amount of people working in the food industry, niggers in general, a system of welfare (socialism) and mass imported niggers who get shoveled infinite welfare for doing nothing (communism v2.0).
And because he was concerned with different things, so dragging him into this is false. Which you did. And you insisted on the "shoot yourself" bullshit, so it's quite relevant, unless you take the hit and argue what you excessively spoke about was irrelevant.
So far you provided not a single argument btw.
> Outside of that, what you want would be war.
Is that so? A war with whom now?
> So you assumed my position without having any basis on anything I said
Am I wrong though? This little conversation happens because you desperately try to dodge and deflect. Your hostility towards me is *because* I am right about you, but you'd feel ashamed to admit it's true.
Remember, you provided nothing to disprove me, not even sweet lies.
> Your inability to address it in good faith does not make it nonsense.
Perhaps if my brain falls out and my IQ drops to yours, I could engage with it.
> what I want is a massive reform
Then tell me what you want. I told you my goals (which you weirdly called a non sequitur). Civic nationalism maybe? Or a good ol' cuckservative-zionist regime? Tell me. What do you want changed?
> No, I want you dead because you as an individual are a shit person.
Well, not really. I work, I am nice to people, I am helpful, I am a burden to nobody, and I drive carefully. People who know me like me. It's just your feckless boomer rage against those who hate your beloved niggers and jews.
I don't want you dead, but politically you should have 0% impact, along with your peers.
> This is nonsensical ramblings.
Well, isn't it true though? You have a nigger offspring, a grandchild who is forklift certified?