New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
and what can ~~i~~ we do to ward ~~myself~~ ourselves against that shit. it's annoying because at least in my case they often know exactly which buttons to press to get me worked up.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Weematanyeh on scored.co
2 days ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 4 children
Well even if they are a total troll or a bot someone else could always learn from the discussion. Power in truth.
DeplorableGerman on scored.co
2 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
"I am the Way and the Truth and the Light. No one comes before the Father but through Me" and Jesus is the WORD, so apologetic arguments are profitable.

today i learned
Rumor_HasIt on scored.co
2 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Thats True 👍
ApexVeritas on scored.co
2 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Very true.


Debate is like physical training for your mind and ideas. Weak men hold weak ideas, because neither have been challenged. Debate is necessary to hold strong concise ideas that stand up to scrutiny.


Good debate requires all parties be civil, honest, logical, and prioritize truth above all. However, even in a bad debate there is much to be gained. An intractable opponent enables you to hone your ideas and explore the counterpoints. It gives refutation to lies and falsehoods, publicly for all to hear. It gives resistance to liars and fools, publicly. And, it gives true information for everyone around you who may not have heard your arguments and information.


This is especially crucial for normies, as it enables us to plant seeds in their minds which come to fruition when the lies they were fed no longer make sense, and our public statements give an alternative which keeps getting proven true. Most here weren't born red pilled. We were red pilled by people that spoke out against the lies, and confronted the liars where ever they spoke.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
2 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I think of it as training. A lot of the arguments at least *seem* to be persuasive so it's good practice to take them apart to figure out where they fail.
Toast message