One of the most dastardly things the jews have done to the white consciousness is to conflate "love" with "allow to walk all over you and enable at every turn". Before (((Judeo-"Christianity"))) entered the mainstream consensus, the Christian West correctly understood that "love of enemy" did not in fact mean treating your enemies of if they were your friends. Christ did not tell the money changers that He was A-Ok with them defiling the temple, He braided a whip and drove them out. Christ is supposed to be *the* example for Christian behavior, so its obvious that enemies are still to be treated as enemies.
Yep, in fact the concepts of "love of enemy" and "turning the other cheek" were only recently re-defined and turned against the Christians by the jews. You didnt see Christians turning the other cheek to heresy and apostasy either, up until the goyest generation took the reins of society.
Blacks and jews need to become familiar with the consequence of being disciplined for poor behavior. It has to start soon, and it needs to hurt them more than it hurts us.
For whatever reason, the people who peddle "turn the other cheek" can't conceptualize that not everyone is going to be reciprocal, but instead, shamelessly exploit and take advantage of such doormat behavior. We have dumb adult children who think every human being on this earth is some nice, morally sanitized Marvel movie character. So dumb.
11 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
I agree with what he says here and most of the time in general, but he pisses me off and makes me pissed at randos, too.
This guy is of normal intellectual prowess. He has not ever said or done anything more intellectually challenging than referencing a thesaurus. He is one of those people who expands a 20 word idea into 1000 words of fluff, but never the other way around. He has not programmed anything, invented anything, not meaningfully challenged any preexisting philosophies, made any scientific discoveries, published any academic papers, or ever used his 6 gorillion iQ points to effectively capitalize, expand on, or otherwise aid his own grift other than to tweet an easy about how racism is correct, which he does casually, whenever, probably after blacks annoy him at the grocery store, without accomplishing ANYTHING by it, ever. If the smartest man on the world can't supply a light-bulb moment to the rest of us regarding solutions, then why does he write essays on the matter? Grift. The man is based and highly literate, but he is a grifter and he pisses me off.
11 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Disagree.
Solutions to complex problems rarely come from a single person. Usually it's a net of thinkers that build on each other thought until one finally get on the top of it.
I don't disagree with that. He still pisses me off. If he's the smartest man in the world, then I genuinely believe that puts someone like Tallest (and a broad percentile of anons in general) into a class of candidacy for undiscovered challenger. It's uncomfortable because I understand intuitively that it's wrong and that the potential of human intelligence far exceeds Langan's. He's clearly intelligent and quite based, and he's doing more good than harm, so I should shut my arrogant mouth, but his claim to fame is a grift or exploitation at best, and outright fraudulent at the worst. I wish he would perform a self take-down and rebrand to "The guy who convinced millions" because I want to believe that humility is right and that the world- God's calculator- would ultimately reward it, but who am I to say? I'm probably just envious.
I don't like his smug 'ultra super everything theory' stuff either, no worries about that.
Ultimately though that stuff (and the iq brag) helped him to have his voice heard, and he's not using that privilege badly.
The problem we have on the far right is that there is so much infighting, everyone suspecting everyone to be a grifter or a plant or only in it for the clout. For once the guy just look eccentric to me (im too lol), imma say amen to that.
He's been trying to push his CTMU theory for decades. He's even tried the academia route but that went nowhere -- either because they keep rejecting his material or he wise up fast and knew not to associate with academia, I can't recall which
He's also using his position of influence as a means to talk sense and wake up people to the way things actually are in this world.
He knows or doesn't want to pursue wealth because he knows that'll put a massive target on his back, if he does not comply with the rules of the rich man's club.
Actual solution to the problems is obvious but a monumental task: would require at least 2 generations of reeducation. And be willing to do it for free. Difficult because 1. Jews are accelerating depopulation and birth reductions, 2. Almost every generation from Gen X through to today's youth have been captured or compromised by (((modern western ideologies))), 3. All of humanity have been trained to accept and adopt technology in a downward trajectory, as in: using increasingly advanced and sophisticated tools at the expense of losing knowledge, skills, thinking ability. If humanity collectively could make a conscious decision to oppose those 3 points and work towards giving future generations true, un-jewed, un-government backed education, then we'd be good.
At the moment one can only looks after themselves and those close to them that they care about in unorganized pockets around the world.