New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
35
well? (cdn.videy.co)
posted 1 month ago by PopularCancer on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +35Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
7 comments:
NiggerWithAForklift on scored.co
1 month ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror )
Close but a little naive. Yes, someone chooses to shut off your water if you dont pay. That's because they own and operate the pumps that deliver it neatly to your faucet. That includes upkeep and recurring costs. Someone else fixes the pipes if they break, not you. That person should be paid.

Obviously the West is a jew winner takes all economy and they overcharge you, that's true. Harvard doesnt exist to educate, they exist to artificially manufacture elites - elites born from other elites - to make sure their friends dont lose power. Reminder that despite being 2% of the population, Harvard's student body is 25% Jewish. Are they really 12x as smart as a White kid, or are there other "factors" at play?

The real problem is taxation and inflation. When's the last time the government has helped you in any way at all to justify the 20-40% of your paycheck that they steal? If anything, they'd arrest and kill you were it not for the ever eroding laws that founded this nation holding them back. The Jews have devised an incredible system of control in the United States. The real elites dont pay taxes, the poor dont pay taxes. The burden falls on those who are willing to take it and do nothing about it: normal, middle class American White men. The middle class pays to subsidize both classes above and below itself. You pay for nigger welfare so they dont riot and burn everything down. You also pay to bail out billionaire Jew banks when they make a bad bet and lose their money. Jews have made the middle class the very chains that hold them back. Without the middle class - the real working people in America, the real value adders - the entire system of leech Jew fucks and nigger welfare recipients lose their host organism. They've tricked us all into thinking its more complex than that.
xxxxxxxxxxxx on scored.co
1 month ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
Several challenges that I've experienced:

1. As a man, the only people who will follow you is your family. I've only had one deal so far that has worked out for a cooperative with a neighbor to pool money together to buy and resell things to generate wealth. This was after pitching the idea to at least 5 other so-called based men that each had bullshit excuses of why they were unable to join in.

2. Bartering has NEVER worked out for me. I'll ask for labor on my property in exchange for products that I have and the other person is "too busy" or whatever. I'll try to trade product for product and the other person (who presented the idea of trading) wants to trade their broken item for my working item with no cash on their side. Or they want to trade weird shit that nobody wants for my in demand item. Or their item is far less valuable than mine. It's so much easier selling for cash.

3. Weak men are unwilling to endure hardship at all. They will do almost anything to retain their ability to buy and consume goyslop or watch sportsball. Until the power goes out for an extended time or some other major event that disrupts their distractions, weak men are unwilling to do anything to exit the system or take any steps to prepare. By then it is too late.

I'd love to hear a success story behind any of this if any of y'all have one. It's kind of depressing for me since my neighbors pretend to be pretty far in the based zone but aren't willing to do anything further than talk about it. On the other hand it has encouraged me to have lots of white babies so we can build our own paradise.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Honestly, the whole things sounds like Commie gobbledygook to me, especially when he starts talking about "money" being the problem.

As you say: try organizing the exchange of goods and services without money and see how far you get. You'll either get ripped off, generate ill-will when you rip the other guy off, or nobody will want to trade. Money provides an instantaneous exchange of value that is liquid and universally accepted by others. The problem isn't money.

The problem is our money has no value. It can change on a dime and the labour you put in to building your friends house can become worth a single loaf of bread overnight. That's bullshit.

Precious metals work because they're finite and, more importantly, useful; they will never drop to zero. Paper money that can be redeemed for precious metals *can* work if the exchanger can be trusted. Paper money based on "muh economy", the flow of money, is worth nothing because you can't actually lay hands on it.

Money isn't the solution, but it *is* a prerequisite.

The solution is people spending their money in ways that will benefit their group.

The middle class fucked themselves by spending all their money on vacations (in foreign countries), luxury goods (made in China), and interest generating investments (benefitting you know who).

Imagine if they spent all that excess wealth, the most the middle class has *ever* controlled, on their families, neighbours, and cities?

The city I live in was built by farmers, factory owners, and local merchants; not exactly poor, but definitely not upper class in any scale beyond their locale. They built, with their own money, organised through municipal (voluntary) subscriptions: roads, an electrical grid, schools, street lights, running water, gas, and everything else we think of as being city-run today.

I have yet to meet a Boomer that didn't do everything in their power to avoid paying taxes while, at the same time, refusing to contribute their money to anything local. They have no problem sending their cash to "starving Africans" but it's "the government's" problem if kids are starving in their own town.

I don't pay taxes either, but I make sure to contribute to my local community when I see the need. If everyone did the same, we could drop the whole government tax scheme and go back to what it started as: a way to organise local effort and voluntary funding for shared concerns.
TacosForTrump on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
No lies detected
FrensInLowPlaces on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Well, Im and Arizonan. Water is indeed a bit harder to access in my area. Plus the Saudis have been raping our aquifers for years.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
He skirts the real issue of course.

With that said, everything he said will only have a modicum of a chance to work properly in a homogenous white society where you can shame, and banish those who attempt to abuse it. Even then, it will eventually fail without some checks, and balances, because once it’s larger than 10 families of 5-10 peoples, you will see dissent over things, small at first, but slowly it will grow, and become full on cancer. First thing that comes to mind is families who have more, if not all female offspring, or vice versa. I’m not even here to argue who can, and/or will contribute more to said hypothetical, only that it can, and most assuredly will be a topic of contention at some point. There are all kinds of other intricate problems that I can list as possibilities, but I think you get the point.

I don’t know what the FULL answer is, but I know it’s not what we have now, and it most involved homogeneity at every level possible.
steele2 on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Name (((them))) you coward.
Toast message