You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 month ago0 points(+0/-0)
The democrat party consists of voters who identify not as individuals, but as collectivized minority victim groups. 90% of black voters vote democrat. The black voters see themselves as a collectivist group, not individuals. If you kneel on George Floyd's neck then all niggers are collectivist mobs who riot. They don't see George Floyd as some kind of individual drug addict. They are a collectivist group.
You may have arguments why you disagree with individualism. I'm not here to argue against your criticism of individualism. That might be a debate for another day.
What I am arguing is that Democrats do not fit the definition of individualists. The collectivist welfare policies, for example, are not individualist. The way they identify racial minorities is a collectivist attitude toward these races of people. They don't see sodomites as individuals, but a collective group of sodomites that they must protect as a whole. And for reasons previously stated i do not believe they are liberal in the sense that they believe in individual freedom. The only personal freedom they advocate is for white women to kill their own babies without the permission of the father or anyone else. And this is only because kikes have ulterior motives to sabotage the White race and White civilization as a whole and sacrifice babies to their father the devil.
I'd also disagree with the notion that Democrats are best described as "progressives." Depends on what your definition of "progressive" means. Most misconstrue it as meaning "progress" or the abandonment of tradition or cultural norms to evolve or progress with changing circumstances. But progressivism leads to the decline of civilization so I think it is dishonest to call that "progress." If progressivism preceded the climax or height of civilization then perhaps you could call it progress. But progressivism, as i see it, seems to precede the downfall of civilization. But i haven't given you a good definition for us to have a good debate on it.
You may have arguments why you disagree with individualism. I'm not here to argue against your criticism of individualism. That might be a debate for another day.
What I am arguing is that Democrats do not fit the definition of individualists. The collectivist welfare policies, for example, are not individualist. The way they identify racial minorities is a collectivist attitude toward these races of people. They don't see sodomites as individuals, but a collective group of sodomites that they must protect as a whole. And for reasons previously stated i do not believe they are liberal in the sense that they believe in individual freedom. The only personal freedom they advocate is for white women to kill their own babies without the permission of the father or anyone else. And this is only because kikes have ulterior motives to sabotage the White race and White civilization as a whole and sacrifice babies to their father the devil.
I'd also disagree with the notion that Democrats are best described as "progressives." Depends on what your definition of "progressive" means. Most misconstrue it as meaning "progress" or the abandonment of tradition or cultural norms to evolve or progress with changing circumstances. But progressivism leads to the decline of civilization so I think it is dishonest to call that "progress." If progressivism preceded the climax or height of civilization then perhaps you could call it progress. But progressivism, as i see it, seems to precede the downfall of civilization. But i haven't given you a good definition for us to have a good debate on it.