Not even close
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Freedom to wear a mask? Nope
Freedom to choose to get the poison shot or not? Nope
Freedom to buy your own health insurance if you want to? Nope. Obamacare. Forced.
Free to own a firearm if you want to? Nope
Democrats are largely the marxist faction of jews. They believe in collectivism. Really they just believe in what the jew tells them but this sect of jew bullshitters lead them on about the working people and collectivist bullshit. Such as Bernie Sanders. Definitely not "liberal" in the classic definition of the word that you cite.
The closest thing to a LIBERAL according to your definition is a Ron Paul libertarian.
I really do believe it is inappropriate and misuse of language to call modern American Democrats Liberals. What do the rest of you guys think?
Other than that, it's mostly about taxing the rich, banning guns, oppressing white right wing extremism, etc.
They don't even market themselves as "liberals" and I might argue that actually Republicans call Democrats "liberal" more than i hear Democrats refer to themselves as this. It's all misuse of language. I make mistakes sometimes and misuse language. I correct myself when i can. I suggest we stop calling democrats "liberals"
It's not the only word that jews hijack and change the definition of. Go look up "Marriage" in an old dictionary. It will specifically state that it is a partnership between a man and a woman. Jews changed that in new dictionaries. You could go word by word and study how jews have gradually tried to hijack and change and destroy our language.
You should really rethink your definition of "collectivism" is you think that. *We* believe in collectivism because we believe in an interest which is not just the sum of all our individual interests: the survival of the White race and of our culture in a historical context.
Liberals believe exclusively in *individual* freedom and they don't recognize any other value. Their impositions are all motivated by the need to preserve the *individual* well being of individuals (especially themselves!). They tell you to wear a mask and get vaxxed and don't own a gun because they think that you are a danger to other people if you don't, therefore you violate *other people's* individual freedom and safety. There is no contradiction in their thinking. You can argue against them on facts (e.g. vax causes more harm than good, guns save more lives in self-defense, etc.) but their ideological reasoning is sound and consistent.
The reason we on this forum are not liberals is because we put other values as more important than individual freedom: primarily, the survival of the White race.
As to your question, perhaps the most appropriate term for the Democrats of today is **progressive**. This is because on top of the liberalism which I explained, they also push for other things such as the promotion of niggers and faggots above and behind what mere liberalism would achieve.
You may have arguments why you disagree with individualism. I'm not here to argue against your criticism of individualism. That might be a debate for another day.
What I am arguing is that Democrats do not fit the definition of individualists. The collectivist welfare policies, for example, are not individualist. The way they identify racial minorities is a collectivist attitude toward these races of people. They don't see sodomites as individuals, but a collective group of sodomites that they must protect as a whole. And for reasons previously stated i do not believe they are liberal in the sense that they believe in individual freedom. The only personal freedom they advocate is for white women to kill their own babies without the permission of the father or anyone else. And this is only because kikes have ulterior motives to sabotage the White race and White civilization as a whole and sacrifice babies to their father the devil.
I'd also disagree with the notion that Democrats are best described as "progressives." Depends on what your definition of "progressive" means. Most misconstrue it as meaning "progress" or the abandonment of tradition or cultural norms to evolve or progress with changing circumstances. But progressivism leads to the decline of civilization so I think it is dishonest to call that "progress." If progressivism preceded the climax or height of civilization then perhaps you could call it progress. But progressivism, as i see it, seems to precede the downfall of civilization. But i haven't given you a good definition for us to have a good debate on it.