New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I think most people who watch these 3 films (Matrix, Reloaded, Revolutions) don't quite get the whole picture. The 4th film doesn't count and is a retconned, tranny jew ass fantasy in order to ruin previous art.

Now, these movies were written by the wachowski brothers who have since went trans retard. They are jews. This is known.

The original trilogy is their way of trivializing God and rejecting his gifts... just like jews. They try to justify this through lofty themes and heavy handed story/character writing, in order to demonize the matrix (heaven) and champion the mud world (hell/existence).

As an example, look how they choose to portray reincarnation, or staying within the firmament: *"Watched them liquify the dead so they could be fed intravenously to the living..."*

Lovely.

However, you cannot tell these stories without all the pieces. Because they are using allegory and biblical themes, they have to follow certain markers and character archetypes. Them trying to do this while being jewish, generates all the clues you can follow throughout the movies. They have to tilt their hand to tell the story.

As an example, most people inside the matrix are White, the NPC's I mean. Most of the shots in zion are of niggerspawn and half breeds.

The Architects chamber is completely White, he himself being White. Contrasted by the core of zion, which is a cave pit with lava, browns. Hell.

Architect is White, tries to give humanity the perfect existence. Oracle is nigger, encourages everyone to disobey.

The Matrix is supposed to represent Heaven, and the machines are just cruel Gods that don't understand humanity and will be easily tricked by killing chickens in specific ways (Hacking).

(((They))) view the "awoken" as greater than Gods, who exist outside of Gods gifts, just to spite him. "Haha we did it without your shit!"

You could also watch the movies from the perspective that the matrix is jewish control, and the absolute insane obstacle course you have to traverse to understand and escape it all.

Or you could take it at surface level and just watch for the dumb slo mo and car chases, which is how most people watch them I think.

But the truth of the matter, is that these films are a lot more full than they are empty. They play around with big ideas, often covertly, in order to make the surface level of black spandex and machine guns palatable.

There are lots of clues into how (((they))) view their religion, God and humanity as a whole, once you understand all the characters and themes they're playing around with.

I found it fascinating viewing these movies through the lenses I just described, because it's like a deconstructed puzzle you have to put back together. They left enough clues to follow, (jews must flaunt) for those of us who understand the real issues, and gave the normies an R rated slow mo bullet fest.

I have also found great success in spring boarding jewish noticing with these 3 films as a backdrop. The big ideas and lofty concepts are presented without the jewish programming. For certain people, it lets them get a handle on what's happening without being caught up in the cultural/mental land mines.

I'm also eerily reminded about how jews divulge their insidious plans beforehand, so they can say "Nuh uhhh! We told you we were going to do it!" as some sleight of hand way to relieve their conscious.

Multiple levels. Multiple levels. For those who enjoy film and never gave these much of a glance, I'd highly recommend another watch.
You must log in or sign up to comment
11 comments:
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 month ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror )
Renee DesCartes was the first to imagine that we might be living in a world of lies, that all of our senses could be deceived and thus relying on them we could never understand truth.

Of course, he figured his way out of the Matrix and laid the foundation of modern science.
Weematanyeh on scored.co
1 month ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 2 children
I just rewatched the matrix for the first time since I was a kid, I was disappointed. It felt cheesy. Part of that could be due to the fact that it's been memed to death, part of it could be that I generally dont enjoy as many works of fiction as I get older.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 month ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
It was innovative for its special effects. Now every movie has them.
Weematanyeh on scored.co
1 month ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
Exactly, I feel the same way about The Beatles for example.
disoriented on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
I feel the same way. There are so many movies I enjoyed decades ago that I watched again and just couldn't understand what I thought was so great about them. That has everything to do with knowing more now than I did then, plus now having a much higher standard of what I consider obscene and vulgar.
Yggdrasill on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
I think Wyatt Stagg’s analysis of The Matrix and its subversion is the most accurate:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CFTmiAx7R48
HEXEN on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Indeed. A very astute and poignant analysis.

This is why I believe these movies hold a lot more water than hot air, despite the creators. If nothing else, a very interesting window to view (((their))) bullshit through.
TacosForTrump on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I don't have anything to add to this other than I always thought Trinity looked like a old ass hag. Single best part of the movies is when she died.
shunpikah on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
If the Matrix were a religion, then Gnosticism would be the closest to it, which is anti-establishment.
Additionally, another point of view, is that it's telling of a future where the 'chosen' may need to go underground. Christopher Jon Bjerknes has a good analysis of it from a Kabbalistic point of view.
DragonsDontEatSoy on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The Matrix has no equivalent of the Aeons or Pleroma.
HegelianDichotomy on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
While I agree with most of the observations here I do think the most basic basis for the trilogy is shown in the opening scenes of the first movie. The book that Anderson opens to retrieve the illegal software - Simulacra and Simulation is a huge clue that few seem to notice. Here's a presentation from someone who did notice that glaring detail, and goes deeply into the philosophy of the trilogy. https://youtu.be/AaDqNDLpZa8?si=TSqHkueI8uJxe-c7
Toast message