He got fatter...
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
10 comments:
18
6 months ago
18 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+18Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
deleted
6 months ago
12 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+12Score on mirror
)
Mirrored from scored.co
Man this really is a test of the ability to think critically. Anyone who doesn't immediately see this as BS is a true NPC.
So theyre saying they executed the guy they got the "evidence" of German Atrocities from? So there was no way to double check his testimony after the fact?
How convent.
How convent.
"evidence about the mass murder occurring there"
Hahah. I love how Anne Frank's diary written by her father is a popular piece of "literature", but an actual testimony from the 1940s (called "Witold's Report") gets either buried, or – in the case of this picture – described by someone who didn't even read it. I did, though.
The testimony is about 150 pages long and there's not a single mention of the mass murder. The author mentions jews once or twice, in passing, not as something particularly interesting (because they weren't even the largest demographic of the camp).
The report focuses on the abysmal living conditions, occasional executions, and power-hungry guards assigning the worst jobs to the most intelligent people, effectively trying to break the spirit of the nation. I would compare it to Solzhenitsyn's "The Gulag Archipelago", though a bit more tame.
And by the way, the report doesn't mention rollercoasters, cages with lions, or gas chambers.
Hahah. I love how Anne Frank's diary written by her father is a popular piece of "literature", but an actual testimony from the 1940s (called "Witold's Report") gets either buried, or – in the case of this picture – described by someone who didn't even read it. I did, though.
The testimony is about 150 pages long and there's not a single mention of the mass murder. The author mentions jews once or twice, in passing, not as something particularly interesting (because they weren't even the largest demographic of the camp).
The report focuses on the abysmal living conditions, occasional executions, and power-hungry guards assigning the worst jobs to the most intelligent people, effectively trying to break the spirit of the nation. I would compare it to Solzhenitsyn's "The Gulag Archipelago", though a bit more tame.
And by the way, the report doesn't mention rollercoasters, cages with lions, or gas chambers.
Obviously a crock of cack.
Most people believe that:
1. Six million yids were holocausted.
2. Only yids were holocausted, i.e. non-yids were not at concentration camps. (Furthermore, this is an important part of the narrative, because it centres yids rather than decentres them as just one of numerous target groups. The latter narrative provides less benefit to the yids.)
So, if Pilecki was believed by the Nazis to be non-yiddish: Why did the Nazis send him to Auschwitz, presumably a death camp for yids?
But, if Pilecki was instead believed by the Nazis to be yiddish: Why did the Nazis not kill him as part of the six million? Or, more simply, how did he live to tell the tale?
Checkmate. In conclusion, he either should never have been let into Auschwitz, were he a goy, or should not have survived it, were he a yid. Either way, a crock of cack.
Most people believe that:
1. Six million yids were holocausted.
2. Only yids were holocausted, i.e. non-yids were not at concentration camps. (Furthermore, this is an important part of the narrative, because it centres yids rather than decentres them as just one of numerous target groups. The latter narrative provides less benefit to the yids.)
So, if Pilecki was believed by the Nazis to be non-yiddish: Why did the Nazis send him to Auschwitz, presumably a death camp for yids?
But, if Pilecki was instead believed by the Nazis to be yiddish: Why did the Nazis not kill him as part of the six million? Or, more simply, how did he live to tell the tale?
Checkmate. In conclusion, he either should never have been let into Auschwitz, were he a goy, or should not have survived it, were he a yid. Either way, a crock of cack.
Toast message